aliyahsinterlude

This account ranks 520 out of 1349 creators and holds a follower count of 2.9M, which is 2.6 times the median size for a mid-tier name. Growth is fast as it gains 62.3K followers every month despite being 3.9 years old. The average view count of 419.6K per video aligns with what an account of this size should expect from its audience. A like rate of 9.39% clears the median of 4.93%, indicating that the content resonates well with those who see it. The rest of the report covers detailed engagement trends and audience demographics.

The audience approves of the content at a much higher rate than the average user, ranking 317 out of 1349. This high approval indicates strong initial resonance with the creative output. Saves represent the most frequent behavior at 0.649% while shares follow at 0.182%. Comments occur at 0.044% and downloads are nonexistent. These figures, totaling 185 comments, 762 shares, and 2.7K saves, show a clear preference for long-term retention over immediate conversation. The audience treats the content as a reference tool they want to keep rather than a topic for public debate. Brands should treat this as high-value utility content that users intend to revisit. Reach is erratic with a consistency coefficient of 3.31. Only three videos hit the 2x average mark and two reached 5x. This profile suggests an audience that interacts with specific high-performing pieces rather than consistent daily growth. This is an active audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary source of income for this creator. With 2.9M followers, she sits in a bracket where brands can expect to pay between $15,000 and $30,000 per campaign. This high earning potential stems from direct brand partnerships rather than the Creator Fund. The fund pays pennies per thousand views, while sponsorship rates scale with the total audience size and influence. Her rank of 520 out of 1,349 places her in a position where she commands a premium for her reach and engagement. Because her like rate of 9.39 percent is nearly double the median, she can justify higher fees at the top end of her range. A buyer should view the $15,000 to $30,000 range as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed price. At an average of 419.6K views, a cost per view calculation suggests that any quote above $0.07 per view likely pays for her name and influence over raw reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Most posts land between 15 and 30 seconds. Producing content in this bracket secures a higher engagement rate than the 60 to 180 second category, which sees participation drop by roughly half compared to the shorter clips. Use the sub-30 second format as your standard to capture more attention quickly. Original audio appears on about half of the videos, showing a split strategy that values brand identity alongside some trending reach. Captions stay short at 73 characters to keep the focus on the visual. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to participate in the content. The standout video lasted 41 seconds and pulled 6.3 million views, which is 15 times the typical reach for this account. It earned 464.8K likes against just 1.4K comments, meaning it achieved large passive interest rather than active debate. Average views of 419.6K indicate a stable and established audience size. Success here relies on consistent volume to an existing fan base rather than seeking sudden growth through viral spikes.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 15 and 30 seconds. This duration is the most frequent length among the 38 recent videos.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a sparse high-production cadence because they rank near the top of the field in followers despite posting well below the median frequency. Their content arrives at a pace well slower than the average creator, yet their high view count confirms that these infrequent posts land with impact. The gap between uploads is much longer than the typical creator's and has remained this way for over three years. While the low consistency grade indicates an erratic rhythm rather than a clockwork schedule, the long duration of this pattern suggests it is a stable choice for their brand. New content typically lands on Monday and Wednesday, while Sunday remains the quiet day. Marketers can expect sporadic drops instead of a steady drumbeat. You should aim to time your tie-ins around Monday or Wednesday uploads, with 23:00 UTC being the most active hour for new posts.

Audience & Reach

The follower count ranks at 520 out of 1349 with a multiple of 2.6 over the median creator. This positioning indicates an audience that provides substantial reach for a single campaign beyond typical niche creators. Engagement sits well above the median like rate, nearly doubling the average expectation. A higher like response means a sponsored post will land more effectively and capture attention more effectively than a standard placement. This profile fits the Beauty category because the high engagement rates combined with a size above the median suggest a concentrated interest in aesthetic content.