tareq.ismail

This creator ranks 970 out of 1349 tracked accounts and holds a follower count that is 0.2 times the median size. This makes them a small account compared to the typical creators in our database. The growth trajectory shows an addition of 5.9K followers every month over a lifespan of 3.6 years, which indicates steady development for an account of this age. Average views reach 602.3K per video, which is high for an account with this follower count. However, the 1.78% like rate falls below the 4.93% median, suggesting that while the content reaches many people, it does not generate the same level of active engagement as typical creators in our network. The rest of this report breaks down specific engagement trends and audience demographics.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate places the creator in the bottom third of the rankings. Saves represent the strongest signal of intent to return at 0.166%. Shares follow as a secondary form of word-of-mouth spread at 0.093%. Commenting for discussion occurs less frequently at 0.047%. The audience performs these actions totaling 1,000 saves, 558 shares, and 285 comments per video. High save rates compared to low comment rates suggest a passive but high-value audience that treats content as a reference tool rather than a conversation starter. Brands should prioritize educational utility over community engagement. Reach is erratic with a consistency score of 1.07. Five videos out of 33 reached the double average mark, while no videos hit the five times average threshold. This indicates unpredictable growth patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator due to their 254.6K followers. This follower count suggests a brand deal range of $1,000 to $2,500 per post. Creator Fund payouts are negligible by comparison because they pay pennies per thousand views while sponsorship fees scale directly with audience size. The rank of 970 out of 1349 places this creator in the lower half of the platform. This position makes them a value buy for advertisers rather than a premium name that can demand high premiums. The quoted range acts as a ceiling to negotiate down toward because they do not hold enough market weight to command a fixed salary. A cost per view analysis helps determine if a quote is paying for reach or brand authority. Dividing the $2,500 upper limit by 602.3K average views results in a cost of roughly $0.004 per view. This low figure suggests that high quotes from this creator would be paying for their specific name rather than just the impressions delivered. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Most content stays in the 60 to 180 second window to reach its audience. Stick to this longer format because it captures the vast majority of views compared to clips under 30 seconds. The choice to use original audio across every post means this creator prioritizes a consistent brand identity over the easy lift of trending sounds. Captions average around 62 characters, providing enough context without overwhelming the video. Open duet and stitch settings invite others to collaborate on the content. The standout clip ran for 77 seconds and reached five times the typical view count. It earned roughly 22 likes for every comment, a balanced ratio that shows it sparked genuine interaction rather than just passive scrolling. Average views of 602.3K indicate a steady, established audience. This account relies on consistent production to maintain its reach rather than chasing sudden spikes from short clips or trending audio.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 to 180 seconds as they make up the majority of the content. No engagement line is provided for this account.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because their high volume of posts per week sits far above the field median with frequent intervals between uploads. They post roughly nineteen times weekly while the average creator posts less than two. This rapid pace is evidenced by a 10-hour gap between videos. Although this frequency rank is high, the consistency grade is moderate and the variety in posting gaps indicates an erratic rhythm rather than clockwork timing. This behavior has only been established over the last twelve days so it is too new to be considered a settled habit. Content tends to land on Tuesday and Friday with a peak upload hour at 22:00 UTC. Saturday remains the quiet day for new posts. Marketers can expect a dense drumbeat of content but should note that the irregular gaps mean specific timing may vary. New content is most likely to appear on Tuesday or Friday for a timely tie-in.

Audience & Reach

The follower rank of 970 places this creator below the median for reach. A buyer should expect a limited scope for any single campaign since the audience size sits at a low multiple of the typical tracked creator. The like rate falls well below the median, indicating a weak engagement signal per view. This means a sponsored message faces a harder path to gain traction among the viewers who see it. This profile fits the entertainment category because the low like response relative to high play counts suggests a passive viewership.