Ruhanee❤️Najmul

This account ranks 773 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.6 times the median size of 1.1 million. It qualifies as a mid-tier name for your consideration. The creator gains 21.4K followers every month, which indicates steady growth for an account that has been active for 2.4 years. While average views reach 116.9K per video, the like rate of 3.13% falls below the median of 4.93%. This discrepancy suggests a gap between total impressions and active audience engagement. The rest of this report provides a deeper breakdown of content performance and engagement trends.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate puts the creator in the bottom third of the rankings. Saves represent the strongest signal of intent to return with a 0.252% ratio. This behavior dominates the engagement mix compared to shares at 0.066% and comments at 0.085%. The raw counts show 295 saves, 77 shares, and 100 comments per video. High save rates coupled with low share and comment rates indicate a passive audience that treats content as a private reference rather than a community conversation or word-of-mouth vehicle. Brands should expect high retention of the content but low social amplification. Reach is inconsistent. Only one video hit the 5x mark and one reached the 2x threshold across 33 videos. A consistency coefficient of 1.09 confirms that views fluctuate well rather than growing steadily. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals drive most of the value for this account. Based on 624.5K followers, the creator likely commands a brand fee between $3,000 and $6,000 per post. This revenue stream is far more lucrative than the Creator Fund because it scales with total reach. The Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views while sponsorship fees scale with the size of the audience. The rank of 773 out of 1349 places this creator in a position where they are a value buy for brands. They do not command the premium status of top-ranked creators who can ignore offers. The $6,000 figure should be viewed as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed salary. A cost per view analysis suggests a rate of roughly $0.05 to $0.05 per view. This allows buyers to see if a quote is paying for genuine reach or just the creator name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The sweet spot for this feed is the 15 to 30 second range where most posts land. Create content in this window to mirror the core strategy of the account. Every video uses original audio instead of trending tracks, choosing a consistent brand identity over easy reach from popular sounds. Captions average 60 characters to keep the text brief and focused. Open duet and stitch settings on every post invite other creators to remix and build upon the content. The top performer lasted 15 seconds and pulled more than six times the typical reach of a standard post. It earned roughly 66 likes for every comment, showing that passive watching and quick taps outperformed deep discussion. Average views near 117k mark this as an established audience rather than a small niche. Focus on high-retention clips to maintain this steady volume of views.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 15 and 30 seconds as 25 of the 33 recent videos fall into this range. The engagement line is not present to determine if this length performs best.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at a volume far above the field median with a high frequency rank. They currently produce content nearly twenty times more often than the average account. While the current pace has only been observed for five days, the sheer volume of uploads suggests an aggressive output strategy. The consistency grade indicates that the timing between posts varies rather than following a clockwork schedule. New content typically lands on Wednesday and Sunday, while Thursday remains the quiet day. Most uploads occur around 13:00 UTC. Marketers can expect a heavy drumbeat of new content to support a campaign. You can reliably time brand tie-ins for the weekend and mid-week peaks when new videos are most likely to surface.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.6x multiple of the median creator, which indicates a smaller footprint than the typical tracked account. A brand can expect limited reach for a single campaign rather than broad distribution across the platform. While the like response falls below the median by over two percentage points, it suggests that the engagement rate is less intense per viewer. This means a sponsored post will likely have a lower interaction density compared to average accounts in this category. The profile fits the fashion and beauty category because the smaller size and lower engagement rate suggest a niche community rather than a high-engagement mass market.