khaled8395

This account ranks 570 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count of 2.1M which is 1.9 times the median size. It earns a mid-tier name based on its position in the field. The growth rate of 142.4K followers every month indicates fast trajectory for an account only 1.2 years old. While average views reach 3.7M per video, the like rate of 2.83% falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report breaks down the engagement depth and audience consistency.

This audience approves less than the platform average at a 2.83% like rate. High shares and saves indicate strong intent to keep or share the content despite lower passive approval. The audience favors sharing at 0.298% over saving at 0.287%, while commenting at 0.057% remains a secondary action. These figures translate to 11,000 shares and 10,600 saves across the portfolio. High share and save rates suggest this audience treats content as useful resources rather than just entertainment. Brands should focus on utility based content that rewards long term retention over immediate engagement. Reach is erratic with a consistency score of 1.5. Only five videos reached double the average view count while two hit the 5x threshold. This profile represents an active audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator because of their large audience size. With 2.1M followers, they should command a sponsorship fee between $10,000 and $21,000 per post. This model relies on follower count to establish value while Creator Fund payouts are much lower. The fund pays pennies per thousand views regardless of the creator's fame or influence. Their rank of 570 out of 1349 places them in a position where they can command a premium over smaller accounts. They sit well above the median, meaning they have enough leverage to negotiate from a position of strength. A buyer should view the $21,000 upper limit as a starting point for negotiation rather than a fixed fee. The low like rate suggests their audience is passive, which might lower the premium paid compared to more engaged peers. A cost per view analysis helps determine if a brand pays for reach or for the name. Dividing the top end of the sponsorship band by 3.7M average views yields a cost of roughly $0.0058 per view. This figure allows buyers to check if a quote is inflated beyond what the actual reach justifies. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed relies on long-form content in the 60 to 180 second range. Producing videos of this length ensures you hit the core audience that engages with the current average duration of 117 seconds. Every video uses original audio, a choice that prioritizes a consistent brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Captions stay brief at 90 characters to keep focus on the visuals. Opening both duet and stitch options creates an open ecosystem for other creators to interact with the content. The standout post lasted 147 seconds and earned 22.7 million views, outperforming typical reach by 6.2 times. It gathered over 400k likes against only 6.1k comments, showing a heavy tilt toward quick taps rather than active debate. Average views of 3.7 million indicate a large established presence where the primary goal is maintaining high volume for a large audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 and 180 seconds as every video except one falls into this range. No engagement data is available to determine if this duration performs best.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Dormant or erratic pattern because their posting frequency falls below the median and the gap between uploads is inconsistent. While they maintain a large follower base, the high consistency variance means their posting schedule lacks a predictable rhythm. This irregular behavior has persisted for over five months, but the low consistency grade suggests no reliable pattern has solidified yet. You can expect sporadic content drops rather than a steady drumbeat of posts. New content most often appears on Wednesday and Friday, with a notable lull on Thursday. Most uploads occur around 21:00 UTC. A marketer should plan for occasional updates rather than a predictable weekly schedule when timing brand tie-ins.

Audience & Reach

The account holds a rank of 570 out of 1349 with a multiplier of 1.9 over the median. This positioning suggests a creator who can reach an audience larger than most standard partners but lacks the top-of-field status required for guaranteed broadcast scale. While the follower count is high, the like rate sits well below the 4.93% median. A lower engagement ratio means the content reaches many people but the specific call to action or brand message may not generate a strong initial response from every viewer. This profile fits the entertainment category because the high play counts suggest broad reach despite the lower interaction percentage relative to the total audience size.