Gina

Gina sits as a mid-tier name with 2.3M followers, placing her at rank 552 out of 1349 tracked creators because she holds more than double the median follower count of 1.1M. Her growth is slow for an account that has existed for 7.3 years, as she gains only 26.2K followers per month. The reach verdict shows a strong engagement profile where her 10.56% like rate clears the 4.93% median. Her average of 2.0M views per video is in line with what an account of this size would predict. The rest of the report covers detailed content performance and audience demographics.

The audience approves of content at more than double the platform median. This high approval rate places the creator in rank 211 of 1349. Saves are the primary driver of engagement with a 0.704% rate. Shares follow as the second most common action at 0.484%. These figures compare to 0.02% for comments and 0% for downloads. The audience performs more saves than shares, totaling 13.9K saves and 9.5K shares across the content. This preference for saving over commenting indicates a high intent to return to the material as a reference. Brands should treat this content as high-value utility rather than a conversation starter. Reach is inconsistent. Only two videos reached the 5x multiplier while two hit the 2x mark. A coefficient of variation of 4.11 confirms erratic reach patterns. This audience is an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships drive the primary revenue stream for this creator due to their high follower count. They can command a brand fee between $15,000 and $34,500 per post. Creator Fund payouts are negligible by comparison because those payments scale with views and pay only pennies per thousand. High engagement rates suggest they sit toward the top of that potential sponsorship range. Their rank of 552 out of 1349 places them in a position where they command a premium over average creators. They can selectively decline briefs to maintain brand alignment. A buyer should treat the $34,500 upper limit as a starting point for negotiation rather than a fixed fee. The cost per view sits at roughly $0.017, which helps a brand determine if a quote reflects actual reach or simply the creator's personal fame. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips define this feed with most videos landing under 30 seconds. The average length of 18 seconds suggests a focus on quick consumption rather than long-form storytelling. High original sound usage means the creator trades trending reach for a consistent brand identity. Captions remain empty to keep the visual and audio front and center. Closing off duet and stitch options keeps the focus entirely on the primary footage without outside remixing. The standout video lasted 21 seconds and reached 43.4 million views, which is over 20 times the typical reach for this account. It gathered roughly 765 likes for every one comment, showing that viewers preferred quick taps over joining a discussion. This high like-to-comment ratio points to content built for passive consumption. Average views of 2 million mean this account already maintains a large audience where consistency is more vital than experimental growth.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds because they make up half of the content. The average length of 18 seconds suggests a focus on short form content.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Sparse high-production cadence because her high follower rank and average views suggest a focus on quality over volume despite the lack of consistent frequency. Her content reaches a wide audience, but the erratic consistency score means she does not follow a clockwork posting schedule. Because the current pace has only been tracked for zero days, this pattern is too new to be confirmed as a long-term habit. A marketer cannot currently rely on a dependable drumbeat or specific upload windows to time a campaign. You should treat her output as sporadic drops rather than a predictable cycle.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 2.1x multiple above the median creator average. This positioning means a single campaign can reach an audience much larger than the typical account in this category. The like rate of 10.56% sits more than double the median engagement mark. Such high participation suggests that a brand message will land with much higher impact per viewer than standard placements. This profile fits the Beauty category because the high engagement relative to the follower count indicates a highly focused audience interested in aesthetic content.