lama

This account ranks 1222 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median size of 1.1M, making it a small account. Growth has been slow as it only gains 811 followers per month over its 5.9 year lifespan. While average views reach 408.8K, this figure is high for an account with such a small follower base. However, the 2.64% like rate falls below the median of 4.93%, suggesting lower engagement on those views. The following report details specific audience interaction metrics and content performance trends.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate places the account in rank 999 of 1349. Saves represent the most frequent action at a rate of 0.223% compared to shares at 0.115% and comments at 0.018%. These figures mean the audience values the content as a reference tool they want to keep rather than a topic for conversation or social sharing. With 75 comments, 469 shares, and 910 saves per video, the data shows a clear preference for personal utility over community engagement. Brands should treat this channel as a source of high-intent information rather than a space for two-way dialogue. Reach is inconsistent across the 28 videos. Only three videos hit double the average reach while one reached five times the average. A consistency coefficient of 2.52 indicates erratic growth patterns. This is an active audience that saves content for later use but does not engage in public discussion.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator due to their follower count. A brand deal for this account likely falls between $150 and $300. Creator Fund payouts offer much lower returns because they pay only pennies per thousand views. Sponsorship money scales with the total audience size while platform funds rely on raw volume. The rank of 1222 out of 1349 puts this creator in a position to be a value buy for advertisers. Because they sit below the median, their quoted rate should be treated as a ceiling for negotiations rather than a fixed salary. A lower like rate suggests they may have less pricing power than top-ranked peers. The cost per view sits at roughly $0.0004 to $0.0007 based on the average of 408.8K views. This metric helps buyers determine if a high quote is paying for reach or just for a specific name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed thrives in the 15 to 30 second range where it captures the most consistent engagement. Move away from longer formats like those over 60 seconds to capture more views per post. The difference between these two segments represents a large gap in reach for every clip produced. Original audio dominates the soundscape, choosing a distinct brand identity over the easy lift of trending tracks. Short captions around 90 characters keep the focus on the visual while including key terms like hubby or traveling. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with the content directly. The standout video ran 95 seconds and pulled 13.2 times the average reach for this account. It earned 83.2K likes against only 432 comments, showing that long-form visuals can still win through passive watching rather than debate. Average views near 408.8K indicate a stable, established presence rather than a new growth phase. Focus on maintaining high production value to sustain this steady volume of views.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors short content with an equal number of videos under 15 seconds and between 15 to 30 seconds. The average video length is 31 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because their posting frequency is double the field median and they maintain a consistent output despite some internal variance. They average over three videos per week with gaps between posts that are much shorter than those of their peers. While the consistency grade reflects an erratic gap rhythm, this pace has been established for nearly two months. You can expect fresh content to land primarily on Tuesday and Thursday. Most uploads occur around 18:00 UTC, while Sunday remains the quietest day for new posts. Marketers can plan campaigns around a dependable drumbeat of content rather than sporadic drops. The high volume of views relative to their follower rank suggests that when they do post, it reaches a wide audience.

Audience & Reach

The account sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator size. This indicates a niche audience reach that lacks the breadth for broad brand awareness campaigns. While average plays are high, the like rate falls below the median by nearly half. This gap suggests the content reaches many viewers but fails to generate strong engagement from those viewers. The profile fits the beauty category because the low like response combined with a small follower rank points toward a passive viewership model rather than an active community interaction.