flydressistanbul

This account ranks 1215 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median size. It is a small account. Growth is steady as it gains 3.9K followers every month over its 1.3 year lifespan. While average views reach 361.3K per video, the 1.33% like rate falls below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report covers deeper engagement metrics and content performance.

This audience approves of content at a lower rate than the platform average. The low like rate ranks 1270 out of 1349, indicating passive interest is rare here. Shares and saves represent the primary ways viewers interact with the content. These actions show high intent to keep or spread information compared to the 0.014% comment rate. With 661 shares and 579 saves against 50 comments, this audience prefers private advocacy over public discussion. Brands should focus on shareable utility rather than trying to spark a conversation in the comments. The reach shows some volatility. Eight videos hit the 2x average mark, while none reached the 5x threshold. A consistency score of 1.44 indicates erratic reach across the 37 videos posted. This audience is an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator due to their follower count. A brand integration for an account with 63.2K followers typically falls within a $500 to $1,500 range per post. This income dwarfs Creator Fund payouts because those payments scale with views and pay only pennies per thousand. Sponsorship fees instead scale with the creator's reach and influence among their specific audience. The rank of 1215 out of 1349 suggests this profile is a value buy for brands rather than a premium name. A lower ranking means the creator lacks the leverage to demand top-tier premiums, making the $1,500 mark a ceiling for negotiations rather than a fixed salary. A cost per view check helps identify if a brand is paying for reach or fame. Dividing the upper sponsorship cap by 361.3K average views results in roughly $0.004 per view. This low figure indicates that a high quote from this creator would be paying heavily for their specific name rather than just the eyeballs. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The feed leans heavily into the 15 to 30 second range as the primary content vehicle. Creating clips in this window captures a much larger audience than the shorter under 15s format, which sees nearly half the engagement of the longer versions. This account prioritizes its own voice by using original audio on most posts rather than chasing trending sounds for reach. Long captions average over 280 characters to provide deep context for every scene. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with the content. The top video lasted 15 seconds and reached 4.4 times the normal view count. It pulled in a high ratio of likes to comments, showing that it won through passive watching rather than starting conversations. Average views near 361K show this is an established account with consistent reach. Success here depends on maintaining a stable presence for a steady audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 15 and 30 seconds. Most content stays under 60 seconds with an average of 13s.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This account follows a Dormant or erratic pattern because its posting frequency falls below the median and it has an inconsistent cadence with a high variance in gap timing. The content appears roughly twice a month, which is slower than the average creator on the platform. While the creator maintains a solid view count relative to their follower size, the irregular gaps between posts make scheduling difficult. This pattern has persisted for about six months but remains unpredictable due to the inconsistent spacing. New videos frequently land on Sunday and Tuesday, while Friday typically sees no new content. The most active window for uploads occurs at 16:00 UTC. Marketers should expect sporadic drops rather than a dependable drumbeat of posts. You should aim to time any tie-in around the Sunday or Tuesday windows when fresh content is most likely to appear.

Audience & Reach

The account sits below the median size with a rank of 1215 out of 1349. This smaller scale means a single campaign targets a niche group rather than reaching a broadcast-scale audience. The like response falls well below the median rate. This indicates that while views may occur, the content receives a weaker engagement signal per viewer. A brand message faces a harder path to gain traction among this specific audience. This profile fits fashion because the low engagement relative to view counts suggests an audience looking for visual inspiration rather than interactive community building.