Irmitits Xo

This account ranks 1216 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median, making it a small account. Growth has been slow for this creator since the account was established 6.5 years ago as it gains only 809 followers per month. The average view count of 420.0K per video sits well above what its follower size would predict. While the audience is not large, the like rate of 8.10% clears the 4.93% median to show strong engagement from those who see the content. The rest of this report covers specific engagement patterns and audience demographics.

The audience approves of content at a rate much higher than the platform median, ranking 413 out of 1349. This indicates a high level of passive approval from viewers. Savvy brands should focus on the save rate of 0.125% as it represents the highest intent to return among the measured actions. Shares at 0.106% follow closely as an indicator of word-of-mouth spread. These two behaviors outpace the 0.026% comment rate, which shows less community discussion. The audience performs these high-value retention actions more than they talk about them. Total counts reach 526 saves, 446 shares, and 108 comments per video. Reach is inconsistent across the 28 videos. Only 3 videos hit twice the average while 2 reached five times the average. A consistency score of 2.42 indicates erratic performance rather than a steady growth pattern. This audience behaves as an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals represent the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on a follower count of 62.7K, expected sponsorship fees likely fall between $400 and $1,000 per post. This model favors brand partnerships over Creator Fund payouts. While views generate some revenue, the Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views. Sponsorships scale with the creator's established audience size rather than just raw traffic. The rank of 1216 out of 1349 places this creator in a position where they are a value buy for brands. They do not command the premium pricing of top-ranked accounts that can decline briefs based on prestige alone. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to negotiate under rather than a fixed salary. High engagement helps justify a spot near the top of their specific bracket. A cost per view check reveals if a brand is paying for reach or for the name. Dividing the upper sponsorship estimate by 420,000 average views results in roughly $0.002 per view. This low figure suggests that much of the value lies in the creator's high like rate and personal brand rather than pure impressions. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Most content on this feed falls in the 60 to 180 second range. You should prioritize these longer clips over the sub-15 second videos, which are much rarer and less common here. The brand relies heavily on original audio to build a distinct identity at the cost of missing out on trending music reach. Short captions averaging 58 characters keep the focus on the visuals while specific keywords like gastric and sleeve define the niche. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with the content. The standout video lasted 163 seconds and reached ten times the normal volume of views. It gathered over 500k likes against only 1.7k comments, showing that viewers preferred quick taps over starting a conversation. Average views of 420k indicate a steady, established audience rather than a small account seeking growth.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 to 180 seconds as they make up the vast majority of content. No engagement line is provided for these specific lengths.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with frequent content gaps that provide a steady stream for planning. They post nearly six times per week while the average creator posts less than two. This high volume is supported by an average gap of just 30 hours between uploads. Although the consistency grade is low due to erratic intervals, the sheer volume of content creates a dependable drumbeat for your campaign. This posting pace has been established over the last month. New content typically lands on Sunday and Thursday with a peak upload time at 01:00 UTC. Monday is the quiet day for new posts. You can expect frequent opportunities to align your brand with their content, particularly during those primary weekend and weekday windows.

Audience & Reach

The account ranks 1216 out of 1349 and sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator size. This low multiplier indicates an audience that is much smaller than the typical tracked creator, meaning a single campaign will reach a niche group rather than providing broad coverage. Engagement levels sit well above the median like rate for this platform. A higher-than-average like response suggests a sponsored message will land with more impact per viewer than standard placements. This profile fits the beauty category because of the high engagement relative to the compact audience size.