fusioncritters

This account ranks 622 out of 1349 creators and holds 1.4M followers, which is 1.3 times the median follower count for a mid-tier name. Growth is fast as it gains 84.4K followers every month despite being only 1.4 years old. Average views reach 1.7M per video, which is high for an account of this size. However, the 1.58% like rate falls below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report breaks down the performance data by category.

This audience approves of content much less than the platform average. The low like rate places the creator in the bottom quartile for passive engagement. Shares are the most frequent action at 0.166% while saves follow at 0.112%. Comments occur at a lower rate of 0.012%. These figures represent 2,900 shares and 1,900 saves per video compared to 210 comments. The high volume of shares and saves relative to comments shows an audience that prefers private advocacy and reference over public conversation. Brands should treat this as a community that consumes content for personal utility rather than social interaction. Reach is inconsistent with a coefficient of variation of 1.93. Only four videos hit the 2x average mark while one reached the 5x threshold. This indicates unpredictable growth patterns. The audience behaves like an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this account. A follower base of 1.4M suggests a potential brand deal range between $5,000 and $10,000 per post. This figure reflects the value of their audience size rather than Creator Fund payouts. Creator Fund checks are tied to views and pay only pennies per thousand impressions. Sponsorships scale with follower count while platform funds rarely provide a sustainable income for creators at this level. A rank of 622 out of 1349 places this creator in the middle of the pack. They do not command the large premium that top-ranked names can demand to decline briefs. Because they sit below the median rank, their quoted rate should be viewed as a ceiling for negotiation rather than a fixed salary. A cost per view check shows that $500 would be a fair baseline if the brand is paying for reach. This calculation helps a buyer determine if a high quote pays for the creator name or just the 1.7M average views. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed relies on the 60 to 180 second window for every single post. Stick to this duration to match the established rhythm of the account. Since all content falls into one bucket, you can ignore shorter formats entirely to maintain consistency with the current style. Original audio is used across every video, a choice that prioritizes a unique brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Short captions around 41 characters provide minimal text while keeping the focus on the visuals. Open duet and stitch settings invite others to remix the content and build community through interaction. The standout post lasted 60 seconds and reached 9.5 times the average view count. It earned roughly 159 likes for every single comment, showing that viewers preferred quick taps over active debate. This high ratio suggests the content works best as a visual experience rather than a conversation starter. Average views of 1.7 million confirm this is a large established account with steady reach. Focus on maintaining these core production habits to sustain the existing volume.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

Every video on this account falls within the 60 to 180s range. The average length for these videos is 61s.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post nearly three times as often as the field median with frequent gaps between uploads. Their high frequency rank indicates a steady stream of content that provides a stable foundation for brand planning. While the pace has only been established for 38 days, the volume remains high enough to suggest a reliable output. The posting rhythm is somewhat erratic rather than clockwork due to the inconsistent gap lengths. New videos typically land on Monday and Thursday, while Sunday remains the quietest day. Most uploads occur around 09:00 UTC. Marketers can expect frequent content drops to support a campaign. You can time specific tie-ins for the high-volume windows on Monday and Thursday.

Audience & Reach

The account sits above the median creator size with a 1.3x multiplier. This positioning means a single campaign can reach an audience larger than the typical creator in this category. The like rate falls well below the median of 4.93%. Such a low response indicates that while views are high, the content may not spark active engagement from viewers. This gap suggests a sponsored post might struggle to generate high interaction rates despite its reach. This audience fits the gaming category because the volume of views outweighs the low like response for a broad, passive viewership.