Misfits Boxing

This account ranks 615 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 1.5M followers, which is 1.4 times the median follower count for its peers. This position establishes it as a mid-tier name in the current landscape. Growth is steady, with the account gaining 32.8K followers every month since it was established 3.8 years ago. Average views reach 242.0K per video, which is in line with what an account of this size should produce. However, the 3.66% like rate falls below the 4.93% median, suggesting that while the content reaches a wide audience, it generates less active engagement than the average creator. The rest of this report breaks down specific engagement trends and audience retention metrics.

This audience approves less than usual based on the 3.66% like rate compared to the 4.93% median. The ranking of 831 out of 1349 places them in the lower half for passive approval. High share rates of 0.361% and save rates of 0.198% indicate strong word-of-mouth spread and reference value. These behaviors outperform the 0.039% comment rate, which shows low community discussion. With 873 shares, 480 saves, and 95 comments per video, the audience prefers sharing content over talking about it. Brands should focus on shareable assets rather than community engagement tactics. Reach is erratic with a consistency coefficient of 1.05. Only 5 videos out of 34 reached double the average. No videos hit five times the average. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this account. With 1.5M followers, they likely command a brand fee between $30,000 and $45,000 per campaign. This high ceiling exists because sponsorships scale with total audience size. In contrast, Creator Fund payouts are tied strictly to views and pay only pennies per thousand. The rank of 615 out of 1349 places this creator in a position where they are not yet at the top of the market. They do not command the large premiums that elite names use to decline low offers. Instead, their position makes them a value buy for brands seeking scale. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to negotiate under rather than a fixed salary. A cost per view check helps identify if a quote pays for reach or brand equity. At 242K average views, the math suggests a fair rate of $0.15 to $0.18 per view. This confirms that high quotes from this creator would be paying for their specific name rather than just broad distribution. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips between 15 and 30 seconds dominate this feed. Most posts fall into this range, making it the most frequent choice for the creator. You should target the 15 to 30 second window over longer segments to mirror the core output of this account. Original audio appears on most videos, a choice that prioritizes brand identity over the reach boost from trending tracks. Captions stay brief at roughly 69 characters to keep the focus on the visual action. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with the content. The top post lasted 24 seconds and earned 1 million views, reaching about 4.1 times the usual audience. It gathered 25.6K likes against 197 comments, showing a large tilt toward quick taps over active debate. This suggests the best content is designed for fast consumption rather than conversation. Average views of 242k mean this account maintains a stable, established presence for its large follower base.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds because they make up over one third of the content. The average video length is 20 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the median frequency with a steady volume of content. They currently output over three videos per week compared to the field average of less than two. This pace has been established for over two months. While the consistency grade is fair, the high variance in gaps between posts suggests some irregularity in their posting schedule. You can expect a frequent stream of new content, though specific dates may fluctuate slightly. New uploads typically land on Tuesday and Sunday, while Saturday remains the quiet day. The most active hour for new posts occurs at 20:00 UTC. Marketers can plan around this high-volume output to ensure brand mentions appear in frequent batches. You should aim to coordinate tie-ins around the Tuesday or Sunday windows to catch fresh content drops.

Audience & Reach

The account sits at a 1.4x multiple above the median creator size. This positioning means a single campaign can reach an audience larger than average for this category of influencer. While the engagement is steady, the like response falls below the median by more than one percentage point. A lower rate compared to peers suggests that while views are frequent, the specific content prompts less interaction per viewer. This profile fits sports apparel because the size provides reach while the lower engagement indicates a passive but high-volume viewing audience.