lizzyparkin

Ranking 1076 out of 1349 creators puts this account as a small account because its follower count is 0.1 times the median of 1.1 million. Growth is slow for an account that has been active for 5.2 years with a monthly gain of 2.5K followers. The average view count of 1.1 million per video sits well above what its follower size would predict. This reach is bolstered by a 17.55% like rate, which is more than triple the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report breaks down content performance and engagement trends.

The audience approves of content at a much higher rate than average, ranking 27 out of 1349 creators for like-rate. This high approval confirms strong initial appeal. The engagement mix shows intent to keep and share rather than talk. Saves represent the most frequent action at 1.524%, followed by shares at 1.214% and comments at 0.048%. With 16.9K saves, 13.4K shares, and 527 comments recorded, the data shows a clear preference for utility over conversation. This audience treats content as a resource to archive or distribute. Brands should focus on high-value assets that justify saving rather than community building through comments. Reach is erratic with a consistency coefficient of 3.61. Only 4 videos hit the 2x average and one video reached 5x. This indicates inconsistent reach spikes rather than steady growth. The audience is an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on a following of 155.4K, their estimated sponsorship value sits between $800 and $1,200 per post. These payouts far exceed Creator Fund rewards because those payments scale with views at a rate of only pennies per thousand. The ranking of 1076 out of 1349 places this creator in the lower half of the platform. This position means they are a value buy for brands rather than a premium name that can demand high premiums. The $800 to $1,200 range serves as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed salary. A high like rate of 17.55 percent suggests strong engagement helps them stay at the top end of this specific bracket. A cost per view check reveals that these fees equate to roughly $0.80 to $1.20 per view across their 1.1M average views. This calculation helps a buyer determine if a quote is paying for actual reach or just for the name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds form the core of this feed. Choosing this length instead of the 30 to 60 second range captures more engagement per view because the gap between those two buckets is roughly double. Original audio powers most posts, a choice that prioritizes a consistent brand feel over the reach of trending sounds. Captions average 121 characters to provide enough context without overwhelming the visuals. Open settings for duets and stitches invite other creators to remix the content frequently. The top post clocked 11 seconds and reached 24.2 million views, roughly 21.9 times the normal reach of a typical video here. It pulled 4.4 million likes against only 12.8k comments, meaning it won through passive watching rather than active debate. Average views of 1.1 million indicate an established audience size. This scale means content should focus on maintaining high volume for a large base rather than seeking small-scale growth.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds since 32 out of 37 videos fall into this category. No engagement data is provided to determine if this length performs best.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a sparse high-production cadence. While the posting frequency is well below the field median, the account ranks in the top tier of followers and average views. This pattern indicates a focus on quality over quantity rather than neglect. The irregular gaps between posts have persisted for over two years. A high consistency coefficient confirms that these updates appear in unpredictable bursts rather than at regular intervals. Content typically lands on Wednesday and Thursday, while Sunday remains the quietest day for new uploads. The busiest hour for new posts occurs at 17:00 UTC. Marketers should plan for sporadic drops rather than a dependable drumbeat of content. Aligning a campaign with the mid-week windows offers the best chance to catch fresh posts.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator, placing it below the typical tracked profile. This indicates that while individual videos may spike, a single campaign will reach a niche group rather than a broadcast-scale audience. The like response is more than triple the median rate. Such high engagement relative to views means a brand message earns a much stronger reaction from those who see the content. This creator fits the beauty and lifestyle category. The combination of a smaller, targeted follower base and an exceptionally high like rate suggests a highly engaged niche audience for aesthetic-driven products.