trickhub3

This account ranks 1165 out of 1349 creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median size of the tracked creators, making it a small account. It earns 5.7K new followers every month, which indicates steady growth for an account that is 1.3 years old. Average views reach 832.5K per video, which is high for its follower count. However, the like rate of 1.09% falls well below the median of 4.93%, suggesting a disconnect between view volume and active engagement. The rest of this report breaks down specific content performance metrics.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate puts them in the bottom 5% of creators. Saves represent the most frequent action with a 0.174% rate. Shares follow at 0.066%, while comments occur at 0.026%. These figures mean 1,400 saves, 552 shares, and 215 comments per video. This audience over-indexes on saving content as a reference point compared to active discussion or sharing. Brands should treat this content as high-value utility rather than a conversation starter. Reach is inconsistent. Three videos hit the 2x average mark while two reached the 5x threshold. A consistency coefficient of 2.6 indicates erratic growth patterns. This is an audience that saves content for later use but rarely engages in public discussion.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. A follower count of 88.5K suggests a potential brand deal range between $400 and $1,200 per post. Creator Fund payouts are far less lucrative because they pay only pennies per thousand views. While high view counts generate some volume, sponsorship fees scale with the size of the audience rather than the raw view count. The rank of 1165 out of 1349 places this creator well below the median for follower count. This position makes them a value buy for advertisers rather than a premium name. The quoted range acts as a ceiling to negotiate under instead of a fixed salary. A low like rate suggests the audience is less engaged with every post, which further supports a lower starting point in negotiations. A cost per view analysis helps determine if a quote pays for reach or for fame. Dividing the top end of the $1,200 range by 832.5K views results in a cost of roughly $0.0014 per view. This low figure confirms that most of the value lies in the creator's specific niche rather than large organic reach alone. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Content lives in the 60 to 180 second range where every recent post lands. Produce videos of this length to match the established rhythm of the feed. Using original audio for every clip means the creator prioritizes a consistent brand identity over the reach gained from trending sounds. Long captions averaging 201 characters provide deep context rather than simple hooks. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with and remix the content. The top post lasted 60 seconds and reached 13.2 times the average audience size. It earned 101.7K likes against 3.1K comments, which shows a balanced ratio of passive watching to active discussion. Average views over 800k mean this account maintains high volume for its follower count. You should aim for steady engagement across long-form clips rather than chasing sudden spikes.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 to 180 seconds with an average of 61 seconds. All recent videos fall into this category except for two clips between 30 to 60 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with high frequency despite an inconsistent gap between videos. They produce nearly four times the average volume of other creators on the platform. While their follower rank is mid-field, their average views suggest strong content resonance. This pace has only been established for 36 days, so the routine is not yet a long-term proven habit. The high consistency score indicates that while they post often, the specific timing between posts varies well. New content most frequently lands on Monday and Tuesday, with a peak upload hour at 23:00 UTC. Sunday remains the quietest day for new posts. Marketers can expect a frequent drumbeat of content rather than sporadic drops. You should aim to time campaign tie-ins around the Monday and Tuesday windows when fresh content is most likely to appear.

Audience & Reach

The account ranks 1165 of 1349 for followers with a 0.1x multiple compared to the median creator. This positioning means a single campaign will reach a niche audience rather than providing broad reach across the platform. The like response sits well below the 4.93% median. Such a low engagement rate suggests that while views may occur, the content does not generate high levels of active interaction for a brand message. This profile fits few categories because the small follower count and lower-than-average engagement indicate a limited scope for standard commercial activations.