mathballfighter

This account ranks 1170 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median size of 1.1M, making it a small account. It earns 12.7K new followers each month, which represents fast growth for an account only 0.6 years old. The average view count of 1.8M per video is well above what is expected for an account of this follower size. However, the 2.10% like rate falls below the median of 4.93%, suggesting that while the content reaches many people, it generates lower active engagement than typical creators. The rest of the report breaks down these engagement gaps and audience retention metrics in detail.

This audience approves less than the platform average, ranking 1114 out of 1349 for like rates. The data reveals a clear hierarchy of intent among viewers. Saves represent the highest form of engagement at 0.134%, followed by shares at 0.074%. Commenting sits at 0.033% while downloads are nonexistent. These figures translate to 2.4K saves, 1.3K shares, and 597 comments per video. The high save-to-comment ratio indicates a community that prefers private archiving over public discussion. Brands should treat this content as a reference tool rather than a conversation starter. Reach is inconsistent with a coefficient of variation of 1.27. Only 5 videos hit the 2x average mark while one reached the 5x threshold. This suggests a volatile reach pattern rather than steady growth. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. A follower count of 85.2K suggests a potential brand deal range between $400 and $1,200 per post. This path is more lucrative than the Creator Fund because it scales with audience size rather than raw views. The Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views, making it an inefficient way to monetize consistent reach compared to direct partnerships. The ranking of 1170 out of 1349 puts this creator in a position where they are a value buy for advertisers. Because they sit below the median rank, their quoted rate should be treated as a ceiling to negotiate down rather than a fixed salary. A cost per view check shows that $1,200 divided by 1.8M views results in a low cost per reach. This confirms that a high quote from this creator would likely pay for a name rather than raw distribution. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed operates entirely in the 60 to 180 second range. Every clip follows this longer format to build a specific narrative before the payoff. Using original audio for every post means the creator prioritizes a consistent brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Captions average 110 characters, providing enough context to frame the math without being wordy. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with the content. The standout video lasted 60 seconds and reached five times the normal audience. It earned 59 likes for every single comment, showing that viewers preferred quick engagement over deep discussion. Average views of 1.8 million indicate a high-performing account rather than a small niche project.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 to 180 seconds because all 33 recent videos fall into this range. The average duration for these videos is 66s.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

The creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with a high volume of content. This creator produces over five times the average weekly output of other creators. While the frequency rank is solid, the consistency grade and variance indicate that the posting gaps are somewhat irregular rather than clockwork. The current pace has been established for less than a month, so this rhythm is not yet a long-term proven habit. Content tends to land most often on Wednesday and Thursday, while Monday is the quietest day for new uploads. The busiest hour for new posts occurs at 15:00 UTC. Marketers can expect a frequent drumbeat of content rather than sporadic drops. You should aim to time any campaign tie-ins around the mid-week peak when new videos are most likely to appear.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator. This rank indicates a niche audience that lacks the reach for broad awareness campaigns. The like response falls below the median by more than half. A lower engagement rate means the content reaches many viewers but fails to generate high interaction per impression. This profile fits only education products because the small scale and low engagement suggest an audience focused on specific information rather than lifestyle influence.