streetkickgirl

This account ranks 1160 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 90.5K followers, making it a small account that sits well below the median follower count of 1.1M. It is growing at a fast pace of 23.5K followers per month despite only being active for 0.3 years. While average views reach 1.3M per video, the like rate of 1.47% falls below the median of 4.93%. This gap suggests that while the content reaches a large audience, it fails to generate the typical level of active engagement from those viewers. The rest of this report breaks down specific engagement trends and content performance.

This audience approves much less than usual compared to the platform median. The low like rate puts the creator in the bottom quartile of engagement rankings. The data reveals a clear hierarchy of intent among viewers. Shares are the most frequent action at 0.238% per view, followed by saves at 0.09%, and comments at 0.022%. These figures translate to 3.2K shares, 1.2K saves, and 291 comments across the catalog. High share rates compared to low comment rates mean viewers prefer spreading the content rather than starting a conversation. Brands should treat this as an advocacy-driven audience that acts on the content by passing it along. The heavy weight of saves indicates high keeper value for the material. Reach is inconsistent and erratic. Only 2 videos achieved double the average views while only one reached five times the average. A coefficient of variation of 1.64 confirms that growth patterns are unstable rather than steady. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on a follower count of 90.5K, they likely command a campaign fee between $1,000 and $3,000. This model is more lucrative than Creator Fund payouts because it scales with audience size rather than raw views. While the fund pays only pennies per thousand views, brand deals offer much higher margins for established accounts. Their rank of 1160 out of 1349 places them below the median and makes them a value buy for advertisers. Because they do not command a top-tier premium, the $1,000 to $3,000 range serves as a ceiling to negotiate under rather than a fixed salary. A low like rate suggests less engagement per view, which further supports a lower negotiation starting point. Dividing this sponsorship band by 1.3M average views results in a cost-per-view of roughly $0.0007 to $0.0023. This check helps buyers see if a quote pays for reach or the name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds define this feed. Every video fits this tiny window, and a five-second average means you should prioritize rapid delivery to match the current pace. The lack of longer content shows a commitment to quick hits rather than extended storytelling. Original audio is used on every post, choosing a consistent brand identity over the reach of trending tracks. Long captions averaging 178 characters provide deep context for each clip. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to build upon the footage. The standout video lasted 5 seconds and earned 7.8 million views, nearly six times the normal reach here. It pulled 115.9K likes against 1.8K comments, which shows a heavy lean toward quick taps over discussion. This specific ratio means the content won through passive watching rather than sparking an active debate. Average views of 1.3 million mark this as a high-performing account with a broad reach.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds with an average of 5 seconds. All 16 recent videos fall into this category.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the median frequency with a high volume of content per week. While their consistency grade is low due to irregular gaps between posts, the sheer volume provides a frequent stream of new material. This pace has only been established over the last 16 days, so the rhythm is not yet a proven long-term habit. You can expect a steady drumbeat of new content rather than sporadic drops. New posts land most often on Friday and Saturday, with a lull occurring on Tuesday. The busiest hour for new uploads is 19:00 UTC. Marketers can plan around this high output to ensure frequent brand visibility during the weekend windows.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator. This indicates a niche reach where a single campaign will target a specific segment rather than reaching a broad population. Like responses fall well below the median rate. Such a low engagement ratio suggests that while views occur, the content does not generate high interaction levels for a brand message. This audience fits the fashion category because the small size and lower like response indicate a niche community rather than a mass-market reach.