Alondra Flores

This account ranks 1033 out of 1349 creators and holds a follower count that is 0.2 times the median size of tracked accounts. It is a small account. Growth is slow as it gains roughly 2.6K followers per month over its 5.9 year lifespan. Average views reach 147.3K per video, which is high for an account with this follower count. The like rate of 3.38% falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report explores specific engagement trends and content performance.

This audience approves less than the platform average, ranking 862 of 1349 in like rates. The behavior data reveals high intent to return compared to low levels of community interaction. Saves are the most frequent action at 0.219% while shares follow at 0.125%. Comments occur much less often at 0.016%. These figures represent 323 saves, 184 shares, and 24 comments per video. The high save rate indicates content serves as a reference point that users want to keep. Brands should focus on educational or utility-based posts rather than community-building prompts. Reach is inconsistent across the 33 videos. Only one video hit the 5x multiplier while one other reached the 2x mark. A coefficient of variation of 4.7 indicates erratic reach patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary income stream for this creator. Based on 185.5K followers, they can command a fee between $1,000 and $3,000 per post. This figure far exceeds what the Creator Fund pays for views alone. While the fund pays pennies per thousand views, sponsorship rates scale with the size of the follower base to provide stable revenue. The rank of 1033 out of 1349 suggests this creator is a value buy rather than a premium name. They do not have the leverage to demand top-tier premiums or decline briefs easily. The suggested range acts as a ceiling for negotiations instead of a fixed salary. A cost per view check shows that the $1,000 to $3,000 band divided by 147.3K views results in roughly $0.006 to $0.02 per view. This helps buyers determine if a quoted rate is paying for actual reach or just the name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds dominate this feed and capture most of the audience. Choose the sub-15 second format to replicate the engagement seen in these shorter posts. This choice captures a much higher reach than longer formats, which only appear twice in recent history. Original audio is used on over 60% of videos, prioritizing a consistent brand identity over the easy reach of trending sounds. Captions average 119 characters, providing descriptive context for every clip. Duet and stitch features are active on all posts to encourage other creators to remix the content. The top video lasted only 10 seconds and reached about 27 times the normal view count. It earned over 430 likes per comment, a ratio that points toward passive consumption rather than active debate. Average views near 147k indicate an established presence with steady reach. You should aim for high-frequency consistency to maintain this stable audience size.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds as they make up the majority of the content. The average video length is 16 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post nearly triple the field median of videos per week. The high frequency rank places them well ahead of most creators despite a moderate follower count. While the pace has only been established for about six weeks, the sheer volume provides a steady stream of content. This rhythm is erratic rather than clockwork due to a high consistency variance. Marketers can expect frequent new posts but should not expect them at exact intervals. Content typically lands on Wednesday and Friday with a peak around 21:00 UTC. Saturday serves as the quiet day for new uploads. You can rely on this creator to provide many touchpoints for a campaign, though you should target the midweek windows for the best chance of hitting a fresh post.

Audience & Reach

The account sits at a 0.2x multiple of the median creator size. This low multiplier means a campaign will reach a niche audience rather than achieving broad reach. Location data is not available for this account. The like response falls below the median by more than one percentage point. A lower engagement rate suggests the content reaches many viewers but fails to generate high interaction per view. This profile fits the beauty category because the size and moderate engagement suggest a focused niche audience rather than a broad reach play.