Ai animals

This account ranks 721 out of 1349 creators and holds a follower count that is 0.8 times the median size of tracked accounts. It qualifies as a mid-tier name. The growth trajectory is fast, with 136.2K new followers gained every month over its short 0.5 year lifespan. While average views reach 2.2M per video, the like rate of 0.91% falls well below the median of 4.93%. This discrepancy suggests that while the content reaches a large audience, it fails to generate active engagement from those viewers. The rest of this report covers deeper engagement metrics and content performance trends.

This audience approves of content much less than the average user, ranking 1308 out of 1349 for like rates. The data shows that saves are the primary way viewers interact with the content. This behavior ranks highest at 0.045% per view followed by shares at 0.035%. With 89 comments and 769 shares, the audience prefers to keep or share information rather than start a conversation. Low comment rates of 0.004% indicate a lack of community engagement. A brand can expect high retention value but very little active discussion from this group. Reach is inconsistent with a 3.24 consistency coefficient. Only three videos hit the 5x average mark while 34 videos were analyzed. This audience prefers to save content for later rather than engage in real-time dialogue. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator because of their follower count. A brand integration would likely command between $4,000 and $12,000 per post based on a following of 850.1K. Creator Fund payouts are much lower since they pay only pennies per thousand views. Sponsorship income scales with the established audience size while fund payouts rely entirely on view counts. The rank of 721 out of 1349 places this creator in the middle of the pack. They do not command a top-tier premium, so their quoted rate should be viewed as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed salary. A brand can negotiate for better terms because they are not a top-ranked name. The cost per view sits at roughly $0.002 to $0.005 when divided by 2.2M average views. This figure helps a buyer determine if a quote pays for reach or the creator's specific identity. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds define this account. Focus on this format to match the average length of 9 seconds. This strategy captures the bulk of the audience engagement compared to longer formats. Original audio covers every post, trading potential trend reach for a consistent brand identity. Captions stay short at roughly 50 characters to keep the focus on the visual. Enabling both duet and stitch options invites other creators to interact with and remix the content. The top video lasted 10 seconds and reached 26.8 million views, which is over 12 times the typical reach for this creator. It earned 305.8K likes against only 1.6K comments, showing that viewers preferred quick taps over starting conversations. Average views of 2.2 million mark this as a large established account rather than a growing niche page.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds with 31 out of 34 clips in this range. The average length is 9 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with frequent updates. Their output exceeds the average volume of other creators by nearly double. While the follower count is substantial, the erratic consistency grade suggests their posting schedule fluctuates in its timing. This pace has been established for over two months but remains too new to confirm as a long-term habit. New content typically lands on Wednesday and Thursday, while Sunday remains the quietest day. Most uploads occur around 18:00 UTC. Marketers should expect a high volume of content rather than sporadic drops, though the specific timing between posts varies. You can plan for frequent placements during the week, specifically targeting the mid-week window to align with their active posting days.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits below the median for this category at a 0.8x multiple of typical creators. This indicates that while individual videos may see high engagement, the total reach is limited to a smaller core rather than broad-scale distribution. Location data is not available for this account. The like response falls far below the median, which suggests the content reaches many viewers but fails to generate active engagement from most of them. A brand message placed here will likely receive very few likes relative to the total number of views. This profile fits the entertainment category because the low like rate compared to high play counts points toward passive viewing rather than community interaction.