✪OᗰO✪➪ᶠᵘⁿⁿʸ♪

This account ranks 719 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 861.3K followers, which is 0.8 times the median size of 1.1M. It qualifies as a mid-tier name. The growth trajectory is fast as it has gained 323.7K followers per month since it was created just 0.2 years ago. While average views reach 2.1M, the like rate of 1.65% falls below the median of 4.93%. This gap suggests that while the content reaches a wide audience, it does not generate high levels of active engagement compared to typical creators. The rest of this report explores specific content performance and engagement trends.

The audience approves less than the platform average at a rate of 1.65% compared to the 4.93% median. This puts the creator in rank 1213 of 1349. Shares represent the strongest action with 0.349% of views, followed by saves at 0.094%, and comments at 0.015%. The audience shares 7.2K times and saves 1.9K times across videos while leaving only 305 comments. This mix shows that viewers prefer word-of-mouth distribution and personal archiving over public conversation. Brands should treat this content as a high-utility resource for private sharing rather than a community discussion hub. Reach is erratic with a consistency coefficient of 3.44. Only three videos hit the 5x average mark and 3 reached the 2x threshold across 38 total posts. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on the follower count of 861.3K, they should command a fee between $4000 and $7000 per post. This high-valueer model outperforms the Creator Fund because it scales with audience size rather than view counts. The Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views, making it an inefficient way to monetize for a creator of this scale. The rank of 719 out of 1349 places them in the middle of the pack. They do not command the premium status that top-ranked creators use to decline briefs. Instead, they represent a stable option where the $4000 to $7000 range serves as a ceiling for negotiations. A cost-per-view gut check reveals a rate between $0.002 and $0.003 per view based on 2.1M average views. This low figure suggests that any quoted rate above this amount is paying for the creator's name rather than just raw reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds dominate this feed and drive the best engagement. Most content stays in this brief window, while the next available bracket of 15 to 30 seconds sees a large drop in frequency. You should favor the sub-15 second format as it captures more attention than longer edits. Original audio is used on every single post, sacrificing potential trending reach for a consistent brand identity. Captions stay very brief at 13 characters to keep the focus on the visuals. Enabling duet and stitch options across all videos invites other creators to participate in the content. The standout video lasted 9 seconds and earned roughly 13.4 times the normal reach of this account. It pulled 361.7K likes against only 5.7K comments, showing a heavy tilt toward quick taps over active discussion. This specific clip proves that rapid consumption wins over deep conversation in this niche. Average views of 2.1 million indicate a large established audience rather than a small growth account.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds with 31 out of 38 videos falling in this range. The average length is 12 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

The creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at a volume far exceeding the field median with a high frequency rank. This volume suggests a steady stream of content that a marketer can plan around for consistent visibility. While the posting cadence is frequent, the high consistency variance indicates an erratic rhythm rather than a clockwork schedule. This specific pace has only been established over the last month so it is too new to be considered a settled habit. New content most often lands on Sunday and Saturday at 20:00 UTC. Content rarely appears on Saturday despite its status as a peak day, suggesting a fluctuating window for live updates. Marketers can expect a high volume of posts but should prepare for sporadic drops rather than predictable timing.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.8x multiple of the median creator. This indicates an audience smaller than the typical tracked profile, which limits the reach for any single campaign. Location data is not available for this account. The like rate falls well below the median. Such a gap suggests the content reaches a wide audience but fails to generate engagement from many viewers. This means a sponsored post may struggle to capture attention or foster interaction among those who see it. The profile fits few brand categories because the low engagement rate and smaller follower base limit its effectiveness for high-impact messaging.