Animal Life

This account ranks 1175 out of 1349 creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median of 1.1M. It is a small account. Growth is fast with 37.0K followers gained per month since it was created 0.2 years ago. The average view count of 875.1K sits well above what its follower size would predict, though the 2.18% like rate falls below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report details specific engagement patterns and content performance.

This audience approves less than the average viewer due to a 2.18% like rate against the 4.93% median. Low engagement at rank 1094 of 1349 suggests passive viewing rather than active endorsement. Saves represent the most frequent action with a 0.086% rate, followed by shares at 0.055%, and comments at 0.017%. The audience generated 757 saves, 478 shares, and 148 comments across the content. High save and share rates compared to low comment counts indicate a preference for personal reference and word-of-mouth spread over public conversation. Brands should treat this as an audience that keeps and distributes content privately rather than discussing it in the comments. Reach is inconsistent with a consistency score of 3.94. Only 11.8% of videos reached the 2x average mark, while only one video hit the 5x threshold. This volatility suggests unpredictable growth patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator because of their high engagement volume. Based on 81.4K followers, they can expect a sponsorship fee between $600 and $1,200 per post. The Creator Fund pays very little for views alone as it only yields pennies per thousand impressions. Brand deals scale with the follower count to provide much higher returns than platform payouts. Their rank of 1175 out of 1349 positions them as a value buy rather than a premium talent. While top creators can demand high premiums, this creator sits below the median and offers a more accessible entry point for brands. The $1,200 upper limit serves as a ceiling to negotiate under rather than a fixed salary. A lower like rate of 2.18 percent suggests they may sit at the lower end of that range. A cost per view analysis helps determine if a quote pays for reach or brand equity. Dividing the top sponsorship estimate by 875.1K average views results in a cost of roughly $0.0013 per view. This low figure confirms that most of the value comes from the content volume rather than an elite name premium. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds dominate this feed and capture the most attention. Use this shorter format as your standard to capitalize on a reach gap where longer videos see well lower engagement. Original audio appears in every post, trading potential trending reach for a consistent brand identity. Captions stay brief at 68 characters to keep focus on the visuals. Opening both duet and stitch options ensures the content remains accessible for other creators to remix. The standout video lasted 16 seconds and pulled nearly 23 times the typical reach of this account. It earned 426.1K likes against only 3.2K comments, meaning it won through passive watching rather than active debate. Average views of 875.1K indicate a stable, established presence for the creator.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds with 25 out of 34 videos falling into this category. The average length is 12 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with high frequency. They currently produce over six videos per week while the average creator posts less than two. This volume ranks them in the top tier of frequency for their peer group. While the content delivery is frequent, the high consistency variance indicates an erratic posting schedule rather than a clockwork rhythm. This pace has only been established for about a month so it is too new to confirm as a long-term habit. You can expect many pieces of fresh content weekly but they may arrive in unpredictable bursts. New posts most frequently appear on Saturday and Sunday, while Tuesday is the quietest day. Content typically lands around 20:00 UTC. Marketers can plan for high volume but should prepare for less predictable delivery dates during a campaign.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator, placing it well below the typical scale for this category. A brand can expect limited reach across its follower base rather than broad exposure from a single campaign. Location data is not available for this account. The like response falls well below the median, indicating a lower engagement rate per view. This means a sponsored post may struggle to generate active interest or high interaction from those who see it. The audience fits the pet supplies category because the low engagement suggests a passive viewing experience typical of broad content.