LU_N

This account ranks 943 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.3 times the median size of 1.1M. It is a small account. The growth rate of 34.3K followers per month makes for fast expansion given the age of only 0.7 years. Average views reach 456.7K per video, which is high for an account with this many followers. However, the 0.85% like rate falls well below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report breaks down content performance and engagement trends.

This audience approves of the content much less than the platform average. The low like rate places the creator in the bottom 3% of performers. The data reveals a clear hierarchy of intent among viewers. Saves are the most frequent action at 0.059% followed by shares at 0.016% and comments at 0.006%. These figures represent 269 saves, 75 shares, and 26 comments per video. The audience over-indexes on saving content as a reference point while showing very low interest in public discussion or word-of-mouth sharing. A brand should treat this channel as a repository for high utility information rather than a community hub. Reach is inconsistent across the 35 videos. Only three videos hit the 2x average mark while two reached the 5x threshold. The high consistency coefficient of 2.61 indicates erratic reach patterns that make predictable growth difficult to forecast. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on the 289.5K followers, a typical campaign fee sits between $1,000 and $3,000. These figures far outpace Creator Fund payouts because those payments scale with views and pay only pennies per thousand impressions. The rank of 943 out of 1349 places this creator below the median. This position suggests they are a value buy for brands rather than a premium name that can demand high premiums. The $3,000 mark serves as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed salary. A cost per view of roughly $0.006 allows buyers to test if a quoted rate pays for actual reach or just the creator name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed lives in the 60 to 180 second window where nearly every post sits. Create content around the 99-second average to match the current pace of the account. Every video uses original audio instead of trending tracks, a move that sacrifices easy reach for a consistent brand voice. Short captions under 50 characters keep the focus on the visuals while allowing the footage to speak. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with every post. The standout clip lasted 180 seconds and earned 6.6 million views, over 14 times the typical reach seen here. It pulled 79.2K likes against 496 comments, meaning it gained passive interest rather than active debate. Average views of 456.7K show this account has a stable, established audience. You should focus on maintaining consistent engagement with these existing fans rather than seeking a sudden spike in reach.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 and 180 seconds because they make up 33 of the last 35 posts. There is no engagement line to indicate performance for these lengths.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind cadence because they post at a volume well above the field median with frequent content gaps. The posting frequency ranks in the top third of all creators analyzed, and the average gap between videos is less than half the field average. While the high consistency score indicates an erratic rhythm with unpredictable bursts, this pace has been established for over a month. You can expect several new posts each week rather than sporadic updates. Content most frequently lands on Saturday and Sunday, while Wednesday remains the quietest day. The busiest hour for new uploads is 18:00 UTC. Marketers can plan around a high volume of content but should note that the specific timing within those windows fluctuates. Focus your tie-ins on weekend drops to align with their most active posting days.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits below the median creator average at a 0.3x multiple of the typical account. This means a single campaign will reach a limited number of people compared to standard broadcast expectations. The like response falls far below the median, indicating a much lower engagement rate per viewer. A brand message on this channel faces a harder path to gain traction with the audience. This profile fits the lifestyle category because the low like response relative to high play counts suggests a passive viewing environment for products that do not require active engagement.