🅳🅸🅻🆂🅷🅰︎🅳🇩🇪✅

This creator ranks 862 out of 1349 tracked accounts and holds 410.9K followers, which is 0.4 times the median follower count for the tracked creators. This makes the account a small account compared to the broader average on the platform. The growth rate is slow, adding only 6.8K followers per month over its 5.0 year lifespan. Average views reach 662.8K per video, which is high for an account of this size. However, the 1.21% like rate falls well below the 4.93% median, suggesting a gap between view counts and active engagement. The rest of this report explores deeper engagement metrics and content consistency.

This audience approves of content at a much lower rate than the platform average, ranking 1282 out of 1349. The data reveals that shares are the primary driver of engagement for this creator. Shares occur at 0.391% while saves reach 0.214%, and comments sit at 0.024%. These figures represent a total of 2.6K shares, 1.4K saves, and 158 comments per video. This audience prioritizes word-of-mouth distribution over direct conversation or personal reference. A brand should expect high reach through sharing but low engagement in the comment section. Reach is erratic with a consistency score of 3.91. Only 10.5% of the 38 videos reached the 2x average threshold, while only 2 videos hit the 5x mark. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator because they scale with follower count rather than views. While Creator Fund payouts rely on volume and pay pennies per thousand views, brand partnerships for an audience of 410.9K followers typically command a range between $3,000 and $6,000 per post. The lower like rate suggests less active engagement, which may position the creator toward the middle of this specific bracket. A rank of 862 out of 1349 places this account below the median for follower count. This ranking means they are a value buy rather than a premium name that can demand high premiums to skip work. The $6,000 figure should be viewed as a ceiling to negotiate under instead of a fixed salary. A cost per view check reveals that these potential fees break down to roughly $0.01 per view when divided by the 662.8K average views. This helps a buyer determine if a quote is paying for actual reach or just the creator's name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Longer videos between 60 and 180 seconds form the core of this feed. You should target this duration to mirror the current content strategy, as the 9-second outlier captures more than ten times the engagement of the 30 to 60 second bucket. This means longer clips are far more effective at building steady reach than mid-length ones. Original audio dominates nearly every post, a choice that prioritizes a unique brand identity over the easy reach of trending sounds. Captions stay brief at around 36 characters to keep the focus on the visuals. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with and remix the content. The top video lasted only 9 seconds and pulled in 15.5 million views, which is about 23.4 times the average reach. It earned nearly 100k likes against 2.5k comments, showing a heavy tilt toward quick taps over deep discussion. This suggests that while long-form content builds the base, very short clips can trigger large spikes in passive engagement. Average views of 662.8K indicate an established audience where consistent volume is already achieved.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 and 180 seconds because they make up the largest portion of recent content. No engagement line was provided to determine if this specific length performs best.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a sparse high-production cadence because they maintain a top-tier follower rank despite posting well below the field median. While the frequency is low, their high average view count suggests each post is treated as a major production rather than daily content. This pace has remained stable for nearly three years, though the high variance in gaps between posts means the rhythm is erratic rather than clockwork. Marketers should expect sporadic drops rather than a dependable drumbeat of frequent posts. New content most often lands on Saturday and Sunday, while Tuesday remains the quietest day for uploads. The busiest hour for new posts occurs at 01:00 UTC. Plan your campaign around these specific weekend windows to align with their infrequent but high-impact releases.

Audience & Reach

The account ranks below the median size for this category at a 0.4x multiple. This indicates that while individual videos may garner views, the core follower base is smaller than the typical creator in this tracking set. A single campaign will reach a more concentrated group rather than a broad audience. The like response falls well below the median rate of nearly five percent. This gap means the engagement per view is low and a sponsored post may struggle to generate high interaction from the viewers. This profile fits the entertainment category because the lower engagement relative to average play counts suggests an audience that consumes content quickly without frequent interactions.