خلود عقيل | ام مهره 🌱

This account ranks 856 out of 1349 creators and holds a follower count that is 0.4 times the median size of tracked accounts, making it a small account. It earns approximately 9.1K new followers each month, which indicates slow growth for an account that has been active for 3.9 years. The average view count of 720.1K per video is well above what would be expected for a creator with this follower size. However, the like rate of 2.59% falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of the report details specific content performance and engagement trends.

This audience approves less than the average viewer because the like rate sits at 2.59% against a 4.93% median. The engagement profile shows high intent to return and archive content rather than public interaction. Saves are the most frequent action at 1.702%, followed by shares at 0.638% and comments at 0.031%. These counts of 12,300 saves, 4,600 shares, and 222 comments show that users treat this content as a personal reference tool rather than a conversation starter. Brands should focus on evergreen value since the audience favors saving over commenting or liking. Reach is erratic with a consistency coefficient of 1.84. Only 5 videos reached double the average while 2 hit the fivefold mark. This is an active audience that treats content as a resource to be kept.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships drive the primary revenue stream for this creator rather than the Creator Fund. A follower count of 420.5K suggests a sponsorship value between $1,600 and $4,200 per post. This gap exists because the Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views while brand deals scale with the size of the audience. A rank of 856 out of 1349 places this creator in the lower half of the platform. They are a value buy for brands seeking high engagement rather than a top-tier name that can demand premium fees. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to negotiate down from instead of a fixed salary. A cost per view calculation of $0.01 to $0.03 suggests most of their fee is based on the brand's need for reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The 30 to 60 second window captures the most consistent engagement on this feed. Choosing this duration over clips under 15 seconds yields a much higher performance gap of roughly double the engagement rate per view. Original audio dominates the soundscape, meaning the creator trades potential trending reach for a signature brand identity. Captions stay concise at 95 characters to keep the focus on the visual. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with and remix the content. The standout video reached 107 seconds and pulled over eight times the typical reach of this account. It earned 141.5K likes against only 1,000 comments, showing that the audience preferred quick taps over active discussion. Average views exceeding 720k mark this as a well established presence with steady volume rather than a small niche page.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 30 and 180 seconds as these make up 26 of the 34 recent posts. The average length is 61 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at more than double the median rate with a high frequency rank. While the posting pace is frequent, the erratic consistency grade suggests that content drops occur in bursts rather than on a clockwork schedule. This behavior has been sustained for two months but remains too new to confirm as a permanent habit. New videos typically land on Sunday and Tuesday, while Saturday remains the quiet day. The busiest hour for uploads occurs at 18:00 UTC. Marketers can expect a high volume of content, though they should prepare for sporadic timing rather than a predictable daily drumbeat. Aligning a campaign with the Sunday or Tuesday windows provides the best chance to catch fresh posts.

Audience & Reach

The account ranks below the median size at a 0.4x multiple of the typical creator in this set. This means your campaign will reach a niche audience rather than achieving broad market penetration. The like response sits well below the median rate, suggesting that while views may occur, the engagement per viewer is lower than average. A brand should expect a less interactive response from viewers on sponsored content. This profile fits the beauty category because the low like response and smaller follower count suggest a more targeted niche rather than broad consumer appeal.