zidimano321

This account ranks 959 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 266.2K followers, making it a small account since the follower count is 0.2x the median of 1.1M. Growth is steady as the profile gains 9.2K followers every month over its 2.4 year lifespan. The average view count of 257.5K per video sits well above what the follower count would predict for a creator of this size. However, the 3.83% like rate falls below the median of 4.93%, suggesting that while reach is high, the engagement depth is lower than typical for the platform. The rest of this report breaks down these engagement gaps and content performance trends in detail.

This audience approves less than usual compared to the platform median. High save rates of 0.212% suggest viewers treat content as a reference tool they intend to revisit. These saves outpace the 0.132% comment rate and 0.109% share rate for the 341 comments and 282 shares recorded per video. The audience prioritizes personal retention over public discussion or word-of-mouth spread. Brands should focus on evergreen utility rather than community building. Reach is erratic with a high consistency coefficient of 3.52. Only 8.1% of the 37 videos reached the 2x average mark, while only 3 hit the 5x threshold. This is an active audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator rather than the Creator Fund. A follower count of 266.2K suggests a sponsorship value between $1,500 and $3,000 per post. This gap exists because the Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views while sponsorships scale with total reach and audience size. The rank of 959 out of 1349 places this creator in the lower half of the platform. They represent a value buy for brands because they lack the prestige to command a premium price. The $3,000 cap acts as a ceiling for negotiations rather than a set salary. A cost per view calculation of roughly $0.012 confirms that most of the budget goes toward the name and content quality rather than raw reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed splits evenly between under 15 seconds and 15 to 30 seconds. Focus on the sub-15 second format because it captures more of the audience attention than the longer clips. Every video uses original audio instead of trending sounds, a choice that prioritizes a unique brand identity over easy reach from external hits. Captions stay short at an average of 50 characters to keep the focus on the visual. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with and remix the content. The top post lasted 12 seconds and earned 4.8 million views, which is about 18.6 times the typical reach for this account. It pulled 156.1K likes against 6k comments, creating a balanced ratio of engagement that suggests the content sparked active participation rather than just passive scrolling. Average views near 257.5K indicate a solid established presence. Build your content to maintain this steady volume and high engagement level.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 30 seconds with an equal split between those under 15 seconds and those between 15 to 30 seconds. No engagement line is provided for this chart.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

Sparse high-production. This creator posts well below the field median but maintains a top-tier follower rank and very high average views. The pace is not due to neglect but reflects a high-effort production cycle. They have maintained this specific cadence for over two years, though the high variance in gap timing makes their posting rhythm erratic rather than clockwork. Marketers cannot rely on a steady drumbeat of content from this account. Instead, they should plan around sporadic drops that most frequently appear on Friday and Saturday. Content rarely lands on Monday.

Audience & Reach

The account ranks at 959 of 1349 and sits at a 0.2x multiple compared to the median creator. This indicates an audience that is smaller than the typical tracked profile and lacks broadcast-scale reach despite high average views on specific content. The like rate falls below the median by more than one percentage point. A lower engagement ratio suggests the reach is wide but the interaction with a brand message will be less frequent per viewer. This creator fits the entertainment category because of the discrepancy between the niche follower count and the broad view counts.