TikTok Star ⭐ ⭐

This account ranks 896 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.3x the median size. This makes it a small account compared to the typical creator in our database. It has gained about 15.1K followers per month over its 1.9 year lifespan, which indicates steady growth for an account of this age. While average views reach 1.0M per video, the like rate of 2.80% falls below the median of 4.93%. This gap suggests that while the content reaches a wide audience, it fails to generate the expected level of active engagement from those viewers. The rest of this report breaks down the specific performance metrics and engagement trends.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate ranks 967 out of 1349. Shares represent the strongest form of engagement at 0.677%. This is followed by saves at 0.149% and comments at 0.054%. With 555 comments, 6.9K shares, and 1.5K saves per video, the data shows a clear preference for advocacy over conversation. The audience treats content as something to pass on or keep rather than discuss. Brands should prioritize shareable assets that function as references. Reach is erratic with a coefficient of variation of 2.84. Six videos hit the 2x average while two reached the 5x mark. This indicates inconsistent reach across the content library. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this account. Based on a follower count of 336.6K, expected brand deals likely fall between $1,500 and $4,000 per post. Creator Fund payouts are much lower because they pay only pennies per thousand views regardless of reach. Sponsorship income scales with the creator's total following while creator fund payments scale strictly with view counts. A rank of 896 out of 1349 places this creator below the median for follower count. This position makes them a value buy for brands rather than a premium name that can demand high premiums. The $4,000 figure represents a ceiling to bargain under rather than a set salary. A cost per view calculation based on 1.0M average views suggests a rate of roughly $0.004 per view if they charge their top end. This helps buyers determine if a quote pays for actual reach or just the name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed thrives in the 15 to 30 second range where most clips reside. Focus on this middle duration to mirror the core performance of the account. The 15-second segment outperforms the 30 to 60-second bucket by a factor of seven, making shorter content much more efficient for reach. Every post utilizes original audio, a choice that prioritizes a consistent brand identity over the borrowed reach of trending sounds. Captions stay concise at 93 characters to keep the focus on the visual. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with every post. The standout video ran 14 seconds and pulled 15 million views, roughly 14.7 times the average reach. It earned 316.5K likes against 6.4K comments, showing a heavy tilt toward quick taps over active discussion. This indicates that the best performing content succeeds through passive watching rather than sparking debate. Average views of 1 million per post mark this as an established account with high baseline visibility.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 15 and 30 seconds. Most content stays under 60 seconds with no videos exceeding that timeframe.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post more than double the field median with frequent intervals between uploads. They currently produce about four videos every week. This high frequency ranks them in the top half of the platform's creators for output volume. While the 70-day span is relatively recent, the pace indicates an active and productive account. The high consistency variance suggests a less predictable schedule than some peers despite the high overall volume. Fresh content typically lands on Sunday and Monday. Thursday is the quietest day of the week. Most uploads occur around midnight UTC. Marketers can expect a steady drumbeat of new posts to support a campaign, though they should plan for sporadic timing due to the erratic consistency score. Tie-ins are most likely to land on weekend days or early in the week.

Audience & Reach

The account sits at a 0.3x multiple of the median follower count for creators in this category. This indicates that while individual videos may peak, the core follower base is small and does not provide broadcast-scale reach for a single campaign. A like response of 2.80% falls well below the median rate of 4.93%. This gap suggests that the audience is less likely to engage with brand content compared to average viewers on the platform. The profile fits the entertainment category because the low engagement rate and small follower base suggest a passive viewer base rather than an active community for niche commerce.