coachnaayaa

This account ranks 890 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.3 times the median of 1.1M, making it a small account. It gains 5.4K followers per month, which indicates slow growth for an account that has been active for 5.3 years. The average view count of 730.7K exceeds what would be expected for its follower size. However, the like rate of 1.81% falls well below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report details specific engagement patterns and content performance.

This audience approves less than the typical viewer. The low like rate ranks 1172 out of 1349 creators. Shares represent the most frequent action at 1.218% while saves follow at 0.333%. Comments occur at a rate of 0.109%. These figures translate to 8.9K shares, 2.4K saves, and 793 comments per video. Word of mouth is the dominant behavior because sharing outpaces both saving and commenting. Brands should treat this content as highly shareable assets rather than community building tools. Reach is inconsistent across the 35 videos. Only three videos hit twice the average reach while two reached five times the average. A consistency coefficient of 2.84 indicates erratic growth patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. A follower count of 343.9K suggests a brand deal range between $1,000 and $3,500 per post. This income source far outpaces the Creator Fund because it scales with audience size. The Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views, making it a negligible source of income compared to direct brand partnerships. The ranking of 890 out of 1,349 puts this creator in a position where they are a value buy for advertisers. Because they sit below the median rank, their quoted rate should be viewed as a ceiling to negotiate under rather than a fixed salary. A low like rate suggests that while reach is high, the audience may be less engaged with every post. This makes the brander's goal to secure a fair price for the volume of views provided. A cost per view calculation shows roughly $0.01 to $0.05 per video based on 730.7K average views. Buyers can use this figure to test if a quote is paying for actual reach or just for the name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The feed thrives in the 30 to 60 second window where most posts land. You should aim for this duration to mirror the primary content style of the account. Because the 15 to 30 second category has a smaller share, choosing the longer format provides more room to build a narrative. Original audio is used on nearly all clips, showing a preference for a signature sound over the reach of trending tracks. Short captions around 79 characters keep the focus on the visual. Enabling both duets and stitches makes every post an open invitation for other creators to participate. The top video lasted 25 seconds and reached 14.8 times the normal view count. It earned roughly 13 likes for every comment, showing a balanced ratio of passive viewing to active discussion. This indicates that while it grabbed attention, it also successfully sparked a conversation in the replies. Average views of 730.7K mean this is an established account with a solid floor of reach. Success here depends on maintaining consistent quality rather than hunting for rare outliers.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 30 to 60 seconds with 18 instances. This duration represents the most frequent video length for the account.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at more than double the field median and maintain a high volume of content relative to their peers. While the frequency rank is strong, the inconsistent gap between posts indicates an erratic posting style rather than a clockwork schedule. This pace has only been established for 58 days, so the rhythm is not yet a long-term proven habit. New content most frequently lands on Wednesday and Saturday, while Sunday remains the quiet day. The busiest hour for uploads is 17:00 UTC. Marketers can expect a steady drumbeat of new posts to work with, though they should time specific tie-ins for Wednesdays or Saturdays to hit the most active windows.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.3x multiple of the median creator average. This indicates the account lacks broadcast-scale reach despite high view counts on individual pieces of content. The like response falls well below the median engagement rate. A brand message will likely face a weaker reception compared to the total number of viewers reached by a post. This audience fits the fitness and wellness category because the low interaction ratio suggests a passive viewership rather than an engaged community.