Family of Love ❤️

This account ranks 889 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 344.6K followers, making it a small account because its follower count is only 0.3 times the median size. Growth is slow for an account that has been active for 6.8 years given the 4.2K followers added each month. While average views reach 992.7K per video, the like rate of 1.97% falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report covers more granular engagement metrics and content performance trends.

This audience approves less than the platform average at a rate of 1.97% compared to the 4.93% median, ranking 1136 out of 1349. The data shows that saves and shares are the dominant forms of interaction. Users prioritize keeping content for later use and sharing it with others over active discussion. While 237 comments indicate some community involvement, the 0.024% comment rate is low compared to the 0.197% share rate and 0.205% save rate. Brands should treat this channel as a source for high-intent content that people want to archive or distribute rather than a space for conversation. Reach is inconsistent due to a high coefficient of variation of 0.95. Only 6 videos out of 34 reached double the average, and none hit the five times average mark. This indicates unpredictable reach patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary income stream for this creator. Based on a follower count of 344.6K, they should command a brand fee between $1,000 and $3,500 per post. This revenue source is far more lucrative than Creator Fund payouts because it scales with total reach and authority rather than just raw views. The Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views, making it a negligible source of income compared to direct brand partnerships. The ranking of 889 out of 1349 puts this creator in the lower half of the tracked field. They are a value buy for brands because they do not command the premium status of top-tier creators who can ignore low offers. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed fee. A cost per view calculation based on 992.7K average views suggests a rate of $0.001 to $0.0035 per view. This metric helps buyers determine if a quote is paying for actual reach or just the name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds dominate this feed. Create content in this timeframe to mirror the most frequent format and capture the highest volume of views. This duration choice ensures you hit the core audience interest rather than experimenting with longerer segments that saw less engagement. Every video uses original audio, a move that sacrifices trending reach for a consistent brand identity. Captions stay brief at 15 characters, providing just enough context without distracting from the visual. Duet and stitch settings remain open on every post to invite other creators into the content loop. The standout clip ran 14 seconds and pulled 3.4 million views, reaching about 3.4 times more people than the average video. It earned 48k likes against 1.8k comments, a ratio of roughly 27 likes per comment to suggest an even balance between passive viewing and active discussion. Average views near one million mark this as a high-performing account with steady reach. You should aim for consistent volume rather than chasing sudden spikes.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds as they make up over 60 percent of recent content. No engagement data is provided to determine which length performs best.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with high frequency and short gaps between uploads. They produce nearly ten videos every week compared to the average of less than two. While the account has been maintaining this pace for only 24 days, the high volume provides a steady stream of content. The variance in gap timing suggests an erratic rhythm rather than a clockwork schedule. New content typically lands on Friday and Saturday with a peak upload hour at 00:00 UTC. Monday is the quietest day for new posts. Marketers can expect a dependable drumbeat of frequent posts to support a campaign, though they should aim to time specific tie-ins for the weekend windows.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.3x multiple of the median creator, placing it below the typical scale for this platform. This smaller footprint means a single campaign will reach a niche group rather than achieving broad coverage. The like response falls well below the median rate. Such a gap indicates that while the content reaches viewers, the engagement per view is low. A brand should expect a lower conversion from passive viewers who do not interact with the post. This profile fits the lifestyle category because the small audience and low like rate suggest a niche focus where reach is limited by low active engagement.