moonmediagames

This account ranks 1136 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median of 1.1 million. It is a small account. The creator gains 15.6K followers per month, which represents fast growth for an account only 0.6 years old. Average views reach 3.7M per video, which is high for its current follower size. However, the 3.14% like rate falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report covers detailed engagement metrics and content trends.

This audience approves less than the average viewer because the like rate sits at 3.14% against a 4.93% median. The data reveals a clear hierarchy of intent behind the views. Shares are the most frequent action at 0.152%, followed by saves at 0.115%. Comments occur much less often at 0.01%. These figures represent 5.6K shares, 4.2K saves, and 362 comments per video. The high share-to-comment ratio suggests a community that prefers word-of-mouth distribution over direct public conversation. Brands should prioritize content designed for external sharing rather than interactive prompts. Reach is inconsistent across the 34 videos. Only 17.6% of posts reached double the average, and only one video hit the 5x mark. A consistency score of 2.01 indicates erratic reach patterns. This audience is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on their 113.4K followers, they should command between $500 and $1,200 per post. This figure is much more lucrative than Creator Fund payouts because those payments rely on raw views and pay only pennies per thousand. While high view counts are impressive, the fund cannot compete with the brand equity of a dedicated following. Their rank of 1136 out of 1349 means they sit below the median in total reach. This position makes them a value buy for advertisers rather than a premium name that can demand top-tier rates. The $1,200 figure serves as a ceiling to negotiate under rather than a fixed salary. A lower like rate of 3.14 percent suggests their audience is less engaged than average, giving buyers more room to negotiate down from the top of the band. A cost per view analysis helps determine if a quote pays for reach or for the brand name. Dividing the $1,200 high end by 3.7M average views results in a cost of about $0.0003 per view. This low figure indicates that a premium price from this creator would be paying for their specific niche rather than just raw eyeballs. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed favors content between 60 and 180 seconds, where nearly seventy percent of clips land. You should prioritize this longer format over the 15 to 30 second window because it captures a much larger share of the audience attention. Original audio dominates almost every post, choosing brand consistency over the reach of trending sounds. Captions stay very brief at an average of 24 characters to keep focus on the visuals. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with the content. The standout video lasted 89 seconds and earned 11.2 times the typical reach of this account. It pulled in over 800,000 likes against only 1,900 comments, showing a heavy tilt toward passive watching rather than active debate. Average views near 3.7 million mark this as an established presence with high baseline visibility. Success here depends on maintaining a consistent style for a large, stable audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 and 180 seconds because they make up the vast majority of content. No engagement line was provided to determine the best performing length.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at a high volume well above the field median with frequent intervals. They produce over nine videos per week compared to the average of less than two. While the gap between posts is much shorter than the norm, the high consistency score indicates a rapid production pace. This behavior has been established for about a month. You can expect a dependable drumbeat of content rather than sporadic drops. New content most often lands on Wednesday and Thursday. Tuesday serves as the quiet day for uploads. The busiest hour for new posts occurs at 03:00 UTC. Marketers can time tie-ins around these specific days to align with the frequent posting schedule.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator. This indicates a smaller niche reach rather than broadcast-scale visibility for a single campaign. A like response below the median suggests a weaker engagement rate per view. A brand message will face more friction to gain traction among this viewer base compared to average performers. The audience fits the gaming category because the specific scale and lower like rate point toward a niche interest group rather than a generalist consumer base.