Paul “Polio Paul” Alexander

This account ranks 842 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.4 times the median size of 1.1 million, making it a small account. Growth is fast as it gains 17.9K followers every month despite being only 2.1 years old. Average views reach 14.4M per video, which is well above what its follower count would predict. The like rate of 4.82% falls just below the median of 4.93%. This report continues with a deep dive into content performance and audience engagement.

The audience approves at a lower rate than the platform median. Saves represent the strongest form of engagement for this creator, while shares and comments follow as secondary signals of interest. The data shows 0.303% saves, 0.048% shares, and 0.035% comments per view. With 43.6K saves, 6.9K shares, and 5.0K comments across the content, the audience prioritizes keeping the information for later use over active discussion or word-of-mouth spread. Brands should treat this as a high-intent archive of content rather than a community hub. Reach is erratic with a consistency coefficient of 1.89. Only one video reached the 5x average mark and one video hit the 2x mark from a total of 12 videos. This audience is an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on a follower count of 451.7K, they can expect a sponsorship range between $3,000 and $6,000 per post. This brander value far outweighs Creator Fund payouts because those payments scale with views while paying only pennies per thousand. High view counts generate some volume, but the true profit lies in the direct link between audience size and advertiser fees. A rank of 842 out of 1349 places this creator below the median for follower count. This position makes them a value buy rather than a premium name that can demand top-tier rates. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to bargain under instead of a fixed fee. A cost per view calculation of $0.0002 to $0.0004 helps buyers determine if a quote is paying for the creator's reach or their specific identity. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The core of this feed lives in the 60 to 180 second range where ten out of twelve videos sit. Create content within this window to mirror the primary format that earns steady views. Original audio appears on less than half of the posts, meaning the creator often trades a unique sonic brand for the reach provided by trending sounds. Long captions averaging 241 characters provide deep context for every clip. Enabling both duet and stitch options across all videos invites other creators to remix the content. The standout video lasted 121 seconds and reached nearly seven times the usual audience. It earned over six million likes against just 31k comments, showing that high-volume passive watching beat active debate. Average views of 14.4 million confirm this is a large account with established scale. Focus on maintaining these long-form engagement patterns rather than seeking small-scale growth.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 to 180 seconds with 10 out of 12 videos falling in this range. No engagement data is provided for this specific chart.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a dormant or erratic pattern because they post below the field median with inconsistent gaps and a low frequency rank. While their follower count is high, the lack of consistent output makes it difficult to predict when new content will appear. The current pace has only been established for 77 days, so this behavior is not yet a proven habit. Because the consistency grade is low and the gap variance is high, you cannot rely on a predictable drumbeat for your campaign. New content most often lands on Tuesday and Thursday around 03:00 UTC. Avoid planning time-sensitive tie-ins for Saturday when the account is quiet.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.4x multiple of the median creator because it falls below the typical follower count for this category. A brand should view this as a niche reach rather than an opportunity for broad awareness. Location data is not available for this account. The like response tracks slightly below the median, meaning the engagement rate per viewer is lower than average. This indicates that while the content reaches people, the message may face more friction in generating immediate interaction from the audience. This profile fits the entertainment category because the low follower multiple and modest like rate suggest a niche interest group rather than a high-engagement community for direct conversion.