ناصر ميرندا&ابوبلال

This account ranks 882 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 357.9K followers, making it a small account that sits at 0.3x the median follower count. The growth trajectory is slow given the age of 7.1 years and a monthly gain of 4.2K followers. While average views reach 1.0M per video, the like rate of 2.67% falls below the 4.93% median. This gap suggests that while the content reaches a large audience, it fails to generate the expected level of active engagement from those viewers. The rest of this report details specific engagement trends and content performance.

This audience approves of content at a lower rate than the platform median, ranking 993 out of 1349. Shares and saves represent the most frequent actions taken by viewers. These figures reach 0.259% for shares and 0.224% for saves, totaling 2.6K shares and 2.3K saves per video. Discussion via comments occurs at a lower rate of 0.042% with 430 comments. The high volume of shares and saves compared to the low comment count indicates an audience that prefers private advocacy and reference over public conversation. Brands can expect content to be circulated and saved rather than debated in the comments. Reach is erratic for this creator. Only 15.8% of 38 videos, or 6 videos total, reached double the average view count. One video hit the 5x mark. A consistency coefficient of 2.0 confirms that reach fluctuates well from post to post. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary source of income for this creator. Based on 357.9K followers, they should command a fee between $1,000 and $3,500 per post. This high-value stream outperforms the Creator Fund because it scales with their follower count. The Creator Fund pays only pennies per thousand views, making it a poor primary revenue source compared to direct brand partnerships. The creator sits below the median rank of 1,349 and acts as a value buy for advertisers. Because they do not hold a top-tier rank, the quoted band represents a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed salary. A lower like rate suggests their audience may be less engaged, which creates room for negotiation. At an average of 1.0M views per video, a cost-per-view check shows that a $3,500 fee pays only $0.0035 per view. This low figure confirms that a high quote from this creator would pay for their name rather than just raw reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed thrives in the 60 to 180 second range where nearly half of all content lives. Most videos fall between 30 and 60 seconds as well. Target this longer duration to capture the engagement seen in the majority of these clips. Original audio covers almost every post, a choice that prioritizes a consistent brand identity over the reach of trending tracks. Short captions of about 65 characters keep the focus on the visual. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with the content. The top video lasted 36 seconds and reached over 11 times the normal audience size. It earned 291.5K likes against only 2.5K comments, a ratio of 115 likes per comment. This high gap indicates that the clip succeeded through passive watching rather than sparking a conversation in the replies. Average views of 1 million indicate an established presence where content is already reaching a wide audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 and 180 seconds as most content falls into this category. The average video length of 61 seconds indicates a preference for mid-length content.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

Sparse high-production is the pattern for this account because its follower rank is in the top tier of the field despite a low posting frequency. The creator ranks near the top of the field by followers and average views, indicating that each post carries substantial weight. This pace has been established over more than a year. However, the erratic consistency grade suggests content drops occur in unpredictable bursts rather than on a clockwork schedule. You can expect high-impact content but should not plan around a steady drumbeat of posts. New content most frequently appears on Thursday and Friday, while Sunday remains the quiet day. The busiest hour for new uploads is 20:00 UTC. Plan your tie-ins around these specific days to capture the next major drop.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.3x multiple of the median creator. This indicates a niche audience where a single campaign will reach a specific segment rather than providing broad coverage. Because the like rate falls well below the median, the engagement is lower than expected for the volume of views. A brand should expect this to result in a less impactful interaction per viewer on sponsored content. The account fits the entertainment category because the high play count combined with the low like response suggests a passive viewing audience rather than an interactive one.