💌✒️ كلماتي ✒️💌

This account ranks 879 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.3 times the median size of 1.1 million. It qualifies as a small account. Growth is fast, with 22.9K new followers added each month since the account was created 1.3 years ago. The average view count of 160.1K per video sits well above what the follower count would suggest, but the 1.89% like rate falls below the median of 4.93%. This gap suggests that while content reaches a wide audience, it fails to spark high levels of active engagement compared to typical creators. The rest of this report details specific engagement patterns and content performance trends.

This audience approves less than the average viewer because the 1.89% like rate falls below the 4.93% median. The low rank of 1153 out of 1349 confirms a passive reception of content. Shares are the primary driver of engagement at 0.724%, followed by saves at 0.153% and comments at 0.073%. These metrics represent 1.2K shares, 244 saves, and 117 comments per video. The audience favors word-of-mouth spread over active discussion or local interaction. Brands should prioritize content that encourages external distribution rather than community building. Reach is inconsistent across the 35 videos. Only 4 videos reached double the average view count while zero hit the five times threshold. A high consistency coefficient of 0.84 indicates erratic reach patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships drive the primary revenue stream for this creator. A follower count of 362.7K suggests a brand deal range of $1,500 to $3,000 per post. Creator Fund payouts are much lower because they pay pennies per thousand views regardless of audience size. Brands pay a premium for the established community that follows this account. The rank of 879 out of 1349 places this creator below the median in follower volume. This position makes them a value buy for advertisers rather than a top-tier name who can demand a luxury premium. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to negotiate under instead of a fixed salary. A low like rate suggests lesser engagement, which allows for more aggressive negotiation on the higher end of the band. The cost per view sits around $0.01 to $0.02 based on average views of 160.1K. This metric helps buyers determine if a quote pays for actual reach or just the creator's name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed thrives on clips under 15 seconds. Every single post falls into this short bucket, making it the only viable length to replicate here. Since no other durations are used, sticking to a sub-15 second window ensures you mirror the core format of the account. Original audio appears in nearly 90% of posts, which means the creator prioritizes a unique brand identity over the easy reach of trending sounds. Captions average 151 characters to provide meaningful context for each short clip. Enabling duets and stitches on almost every video invites other creators to interact with and remix the content. The top post lasted 6 seconds and reached three times the typical audience. It earned 7.7K likes against 157 comments, a ratio of roughly 49 likes per comment that indicates passive viewing over active debate. This high like-to-comment gap shows the clip succeeded through quick taps rather than sparking deep conversation. Average views of 160.1K show this is an established account with a stable following. Success here depends on maintaining consistent engagement within a set audience rather than chasing viral spikes.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds as all 35 recent posts fall into this category. The average video length is 6 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at a volume far exceeding the field median with a high frequency rank. Their output of over twenty videos per week creates a dense stream of content compared to the average creator. While the high consistency score indicates a solid routine, the variance in timing suggests some inconsistency in the exact gap between posts. This pace has only been established for 12 days so it is too new to be considered a long-term settled habit. New content most frequently lands on Wednesday and Friday around 19:00 UTC. Sunday remains the quietest day for uploads. Marketers can expect a heavy drumbeat of posts rather than sporadic drops. You should time your tie-ins for the midweek spikes when new content is most likely to appear.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.3x multiple of the median creator. This specific ranking means a single campaign will reach a niche segment rather than achieving broadcast-scale visibility. A like response of 1.89% falls well below the median rate of 4.93%. Such a gap indicates that while the content reaches many viewers, the engagement per view is weak for a brand message. The account fits the poetry and literature category because the niche follower count and low like ratio suggest a specialized audience rather than a general interest demographic.