dr.abdullahalshammari

This account ranks 1246 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 43.2K followers, making it a small account that is less than 0.1 times the median size of 1.1M followers. Growth is slow as the creator gains only 618 followers per month over an age of 5.8 years. The average of 2.3M views per video far exceeds what the follower count predicts, yet the 1.41% like rate falls below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report covers detailed engagement patterns and content performance.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate places the creator at rank 1257 of 1349. Engagement behavior shows high intent to return through saves and shares. Saves represent the highest engagement activity at 0.313% while shares follow at 0.207%. These behaviors far outpace the 0.026% comment rate. The audience prefers keeping content for later reference or spreading it via word of mouth rather than joining a public conversation. With 588 comments, 4.7K shares, and 7.1K saves, these metrics indicate high utility but low social interaction. A brand should focus on creating evergreen value rather than seeking immediate community dialogue. Reach is inconsistent with a 1.6 consistency coefficient. While 6 videos hit the 2x average and 2 reached the 5x threshold, the high CV suggests erratic performance. This is an active audience that values utility over passive scrolling.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary source of income for this creator. With 43.2K followers, they can command a fee between $150 and $450 per post. Creator Fund payouts are much lower because those payments scale with views but pay only pennies per thousand. Sponsorship revenue scales with the follower count to offer more stability than view-based payouts. The rank of 1246 out of 1349 means this creator sits well below the median for influence. This position makes them a value buy for brands rather than a premium name. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to negotiate under instead of a fixed salary. A low like rate suggests they may be less engaged with their audience, which helps justify lower offers during negotiations. A cost per view check reveals the true value of the reach. Dividing the $450 top end of the band by 2.3M average views results in a cost of roughly $0.0002 per view. This low figure indicates that any premium paid is for the specific content niche rather than large scale. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Most videos land in the 30 to 60 second window where the account finds its stride. Focus on this duration to mimic the core behavior of the feed. Original audio dominates nearly every post, a choice that prioritizes a consistent brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Captions stay short at about 78 characters to keep the focus on the visual. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with and remix the content. The standout clip lasted 49 seconds and pulled 17.3 million views, hitting a reach roughly 7.7 times higher than average. It earned 234.8K likes against 3.1K comments, showing that viewers preferred quick taps over joining a debate. Average views of 2.3 million suggest this account has already established a wide audience rather than seeking a small niche growth.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 30 and 60 seconds with 19 total entries. This duration represents the most frequent video length for the account.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Dormant or erratic pattern because they post below the median frequency with an inconsistent cadence and a lower follower rank. The gap between posts is wider than the field average, and the high consistency score indicates unpredictable timing rather than a steady routine. This behavior has persisted for over six months, but the irregular intervals make it difficult to predict exactly when new content will land. Content tends to appear on Sunday and Monday, while Thursday remains the quietest day of the week. The busiest upload hour occurs at 22:00 UTC. Marketers should expect sporadic drops rather than a dependable drumbeat of posts. You should aim to time tie-ins around the Sunday or Monday windows where activity is most likely to occur.

Audience & Reach

The account sits below the median creator size with a multiple of 0.0x. This position indicates that a single campaign will reach a niche group rather than achieving broad reach across the platform. The like response falls well below the median rate, indicating a much lower engagement frequency per viewer. A brand should expect this level of interaction to result in less immediate engagement from the audience compared to average benchmarks. This profile fits the health and wellness category because the low like ratio suggests an audience that consumes content for information rather than high-frequency social interaction.