هَديل

This account ranks 1273 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is less than one times the median creator size, making it a small account. It earns 521 new followers per month to grow slowly over its 5.3 year lifespan. While average views reach 744.3K, the 3.71% like rate falls below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report covers specific engagement patterns and content performance.

This audience approves less than the typical viewer based on a 3.71% like rate. Shares are the dominant action at 0.782%, followed by saves at 0.327%, while comments sit at 0.046%. The raw counts of 5.8K shares, 2.4K saves, and 343 comments show that word-of-mouth spread is the primary way this audience interacts with content. High share and save rates indicate high intent to keep or distribute the content despite low direct conversation. Brands should treat this as a distribution channel rather than a community hub. Reach is erratic with a consistency coefficient of 1.68. Only two videos hit the 2x average while one reached 5x. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Given 33.2K followers, expected sponsorship fees likely fall between $100 and $500 per post. This income source scales with follower count rather than view volume. Creator Fund payouts are much lower because they pay only pennies per thousand views regardless of reach. The low rank of 1273 out of 1349 means this creator is a value buy for advertisers. A top ranked name commands a premium to decline briefs, but a below median profile allows buyers to negotiate the quoted range as a ceiling rather than a fixed salary. The lower like rate suggests some room to negotiate toward the bottom of that bracket. A cost per view calculation based on 744.3K average views helps verify if a quote pays for reach or brand equity. A fee near $500 would indicate the buyer is paying for the high view count rather than a specific name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds define this feed. Because the 15 to 30 second bucket earns a much lower engagement rate, you should favor the sub-15 format to capture more interest per view. Original audio is the standard here, trading potential reach from trends for a consistent brand feel. The top video lasted 58 seconds and pulled 7.7 times the normal reach. It earned roughly 35 likes for every comment, showing it sparked steady interaction rather than just passive taps. Average views of 744.3K show this account maintains a high floor of visibility across its current audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds because they make up 75% of the content. This duration is also the most frequent choice for the average length of 13 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

The pattern is dormant or erratic because the creator lacks a measurable posting frequency and holds a low consistency grade with high variance in post gaps. Data on specific upload days and hours is unavailable. Because the pace is not established over any period of time, it is impossible to determine if you can rely on a dependable drumbeat for a campaign. You cannot currently time a tie-in based on predictable content drops.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits below the median multiplier of one, indicating a niche reach rather than broadcast scale. A brand should expect limited total reach from a single campaign. The like response falls below the median by over one percent. This suggests a weaker engagement rate for every view compared to typical creator benchmarks. This account fits the beauty category because the small audience size and lower like rate suggest a very specific, niche interest group.