cute_dog888

With a rank of 1270 out of 1349 tracked creators and a follower count that is 0.0x the median of 1.1M, this account is a small account. It has gained 3.1K followers per month since its start 0.9 years ago, which marks its growth as fast for an account of this age. The average view count of 370.2K sits well above what the follower count suggests. Additionally, the 10.31% like rate more than doubles the median of 4.93%, indicating very high engagement from the viewers who see the content. The rest of the report covers specific audience demographics and content performance trends.

This audience approves of content at more than double the median rate. High engagement levels place the account in the top 17 percent of the platform. Saves represent the most frequent action with a 0.61% rate. This indicates high keeper value and intent to return to the content. Shares follow at 0.154%, showing steady word-of-mouth spread. Comments occur at 0.016%. While raw counts show 58 comments, 570 shares, and 2.3K saves, the percentages reveal a clear priority of personal bookmarking over public discussion. Brands should treat this as an audience that values utility or aesthetic inspiration for private use rather than community interaction. Reach is inconsistent across the 29 videos. Only one video hit the 5x mark while another cleared the 2x threshold. A consistency score of 5.31 suggests erratic reach patterns. This is an active audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. With 34.3K followers, they can expect a campaign fee between $100 and $350 per post. Creator Fund payouts depend on views and pay only pennies per thousand impressions. This makes brand deals much more lucrative than platform payouts because sponsorship rates scale with the follower count rather than just raw traffic. The rank of 1270 out of 1349 indicates a lower tier of influence where creators lack the leverage to demand premium fees. A buyer should view the $100 to $350 range as a ceiling for negotiations rather than a fixed salary. High engagement rates suggest they can command the top end of this range, but their rank keeps them in a position where they must be accessible to brands. A cost per view check helps determine if a fee pays for reach or brand equity. A rate of $350 divided by 370.2K views results in about $0.0009 per view. This low figure confirms that the creator is currently valued more for their content style than as an elite authority. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Every video on this account falls into the 60 to 180 second range. Focus on these longer clips to mirror the established rhythm of the feed. The use of original audio across every post means the creator trades potential trend-based reach for a consistent, recognizable brand identity. Captions stay brief at an average of 53 characters to keep the focus on the visual content. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with and remix the footage. The top video lasted 66 seconds and earned 10.6 million views, which is 28.6 times the typical reach of a standard post. It gathered over one million likes against only 1.6k comments, showing that its success came from passive watching rather than active debate. Average views near 370.2K indicate this account has established steady volume for a loyal audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

All 29 videos are between 60 to 180 seconds long with an average of 64s. This account favors the 60 to 180s range as it is the only category used.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with a high frequency rank. They produce content at more than double the rate of the average creator. While their volume is high, the inconsistent gap between posts suggests an erratic posting schedule rather than a clockwork routine. This pace has been established for over six weeks. Content typically lands on Wednesday and Thursday, with 12:00 UTC being the busiest hour for new uploads. Saturday serves as the quiet day. A marketer can expect frequent content drops to maintain a presence, though they should plan around specific mid-week windows for primary tie-ins since the posting rhythm lacks steady regularity.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.0x multiple of the median creator. This indicates an audience that is smaller than the typical tracked creator and lacks broadcast-scale reach despite high engagement spikes. A like rate more than double the median suggests a very strong response to content. A brand message will land with higher impact per viewer compared to standard benchmarks. This account fits the pet supplies category because the high engagement rates suggest an audience that interacts heavily with animal-focused content despite the smaller follower base.