⇣✮ هہمس ✮⇡

This account ranks 801 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 516.4K followers, making it a small account as its follower count is less than half the median of 1.1M. It gains roughly 13.4K followers each month, which indicates steady growth for an account that has been active for 3.2 years. While average views reach 136.9K per video, the 1.82% like rate falls well below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report breaks down the engagement patterns and content performance.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate ranks 1169 out of 1349. The data shows a clear preference for advocacy over conversation. Shares at 0.952% represent the most frequent action, followed by saves at 0.154%. Comments sit much lower at 0.086%. These figures correlate to 1.3K shares and 211 saves across 118 comments. Sharing is the dominant behavior for this audience. Brands should expect high word-of-mouth spread but low direct engagement in the comment sections. Reach remains inconsistent. Seven out of 35 videos reached the 2x average, while none hit the 5x mark. A coefficient of variation of 1.15 indicates erratic reach across the catalog. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator because of their 516.4K followers. This audience size suggests a potential sponsorship band between $3,000 and $6,000 per post. Creator Fund payouts are much lower since they pay pennies per thousand views. Brand deals scale with total reach while the Creator Fund only rewards raw view counts at low rates. The rank of 801 out of 1349 places this creator in a position where they are not yet a premium name. Because they sit below the median, their quoted rate should be viewed as a ceiling to negotiate under rather than a fixed salary. A lower like rate suggests some room for negotiation within that top end of the bracket. A cost per view check helps determine if a brand is paying for reach or for the creator's identity. Dividing the $6,000 upper limit by 136.9K average views results in roughly $0.04 per view. This figure helps buyers verify if a quoted rate reflects actual exposure. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed operates exclusively in the sub-15 second range. Every clip under 15 seconds serves as the standard here since no other durations exist in the data. Because there are no longer clips to compare it against, stick to this short format to maintain consistency with the current style. Original audio is used on every single post, a choice that prioritizes a unique brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Captions stay brief at 35 characters to ensure the text supports rather than distracts from the video. Enabling both duet and stitch for every post creates an open environment where other creators can easily remix the content. The standout video lasted 6 seconds and pulled 644.7K views, reaching about 4.7 times the usual audience. It earned 9.4K likes against 186 comments, a ratio of roughly 51 likes for every comment. This lopsided split means the clip gained traction through quick taps rather than sparking deep discussion. Average views near 136.9K indicate a steady, established presence rather than an emerging niche.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds with an average of 6s. All 35 recent videos fall into this category.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at a volume far exceeding the median with high frequency. They currently produce over thirty videos per week compared to the typical two. While their follower rank is strong, the sheer output makes them a reliable source of content for brand planning. This pace has only been established for eight days so it is too new to confirm as a long-term habit. The gap between posts remains short but follows an erratic rhythm rather than a clockwork schedule. New content most frequently lands on Monday and Tuesday, with the busiest hour occurring at 21:00 UTC. Sunday serves as the quiet day for uploads. Marketers can expect a heavy drumbeat of content to work with during any campaign. You can reliably time tie-ins around the high volume of posts expected on Mondays and Tuesdays.

Audience & Reach

The account ranks in the bottom half of tracked creators with a multiple below one compared to the median. This indicates that while individual videos may see high views, the total reach remains concentrated rather than reaching broadcast scale. The like rate falls well below the median percentage. Such a gap suggests that the engagement is low relative to the volume of views, making it harder for a sponsored message to gain traction with the viewer. This audience fits the entertainment category because the high view counts paired with lower engagement suggest a passive viewing experience rather than a highly interactive community.