Nasser_ALDossari/معلومة طبية🫀

This account ranks 873 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 379.8K followers, making it a small account that sits at 0.3x the median follower count of 1.1M. Growth is slow as the profile adds 4.3K followers per month over its 7.4 year lifespan. The reach verdict shows average views of 850.1K per video, which is high for a creator with this many followers, but the 3.07% like rate falls below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report breaks down engagement patterns and content performance.

This audience approves less than the average user. The like rate of 3.07% sits below the 4.93% median at rank 914 of 1349. Saves represent the most frequent action with a 1.521% rate followed by shares at 0.441%. Comments occur at a much lower rate of 0.052%. These actions total 12,900 saves, 3,800 shares, and 438 comments across the content. The audience prioritizes high keeper value over active conversation or public advocacy. Brands should treat this as an archive-heavy community that stores content for private use rather than a group that engages in public dialogue. Reach is inconsistent and rarely hits high peaks. Only three videos reached double the average view count while none hit five times the average. A coefficient of variation of 0.76 indicates erratic reach patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals represent the primary revenue stream for this creator. A follower count of 379.8K suggests a potential sponsorship range between $2,000 and $4,000 per post. Creator Fund payouts are much lower because they pay only pennies per thousand views. Sponsorship income scales with the size of the audience while fund payments depend on raw views. The rank of 873 out of 1349 places this creator in a position to be a value buy for brands. Because they sit below the median, their quoted rates should be viewed as a ceiling rather than a fixed salary. A buyer can use the $4,000 upper limit to negotiate a more favorable deal. The lower like rate suggests less engagement per view, which further supports a negotiation from the top of the range. A cost-per-view gut check helps determine if a quote pays for reach or brand equity. Dividing the high end of the sponsorship band by 850.1K average views results in a cost of roughly $0.004 per view. This metric allows a buyer to see if a premium is being paid for the name alone. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This feed thrives in the 30 to 60 second and 60 to 180 second buckets. Most content stays under three minutes, so target that sweet spot for consistent performance. Original audio covers nearly all posts, a choice that favors brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Captions stay brief at 75 characters to keep focus on the visual. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to remix these clips. The standout video lasted 57 seconds and reached 2.7 times the normal view count. It gathered 54.0K likes against 922 comments, showing a preference for passive watching over active debate. Average views of 850.1K indicate an established audience rather than a small niche. Focus on high-quality production to maintain this steady volume.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 30 and 180 seconds since these two categories contain the most content. The average video length is 51s.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a sparse high-production cadence. While the posting frequency falls well below the field median, the account ranks near the top of the field in follower count and average views. This indicates a deliberate production cycle rather than an inactive profile. The pace has remained stable for nearly a year. The gap between posts is irregular due to a higher consistency coefficient. You cannot rely on a clockwork schedule because the creator favors quality over volume. New content typically lands on Sunday and Wednesday. Friday remains the quiet day for new uploads, while the busiest hour for fresh posts occurs at 18:00 UTC. Marketers should expect sporadic drops rather than a steady drumbeat of content. You can time a campaign around the specific windows of Sunday or Wednesday when new material is most likely to appear.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.3x multiple of the median creator, placing it below the typical scale for this category. A brand should expect a niche reach rather than broad exposure from a single campaign on this account. The like rate falls well below the median mark. This indicates that while views may occur, the engagement per viewer is less frequent than average. Such a gap suggests a sponsored message will receive a lower interaction rate relative to its total reach. This audience fits the healthcare category because the content focuses on medical information despite the lower comparative engagement rates.