ʜᴜssᴀɪɴ ᴀʟᴍᴜʜᴀɴɴᴀ

This account ranks 1330 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.0x the median of 1.1M, making it a small account. Growth is slow for an account that has been active for 4.6 years with only 149 followers gained per month. The average view count of 181.6K sits well above what would be expected for an account of this size. However, the 0.90% like rate falls below the median of 4.93%, suggesting a disconnect between views and active engagement. The rest of this report breaks down these engagement gaps and content performance.

This audience approves of content far less than the platform average, ranking 1310 out of 1349 in like rates. The data shows high advocacy through shares at 0.953% compared to a low discussion rate of 0.09%. With 164 comments, 1.7K shares, and 201 saves per video, the audience favors word-of-mouth spread over community conversation. Saves at 0.111% indicate some keeper value despite zero downloads. Brands should expect this content to spread quickly through peer sharing rather than building active dialogue. Reach is inconsistent with a coefficient of variation of 4.25. Only three videos hit the 2x average mark and two reached the 5x threshold. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships drive the primary value for this creator rather than the Creator Fund. A follower count of 8.3K suggests a sponsorship range of $50 to $150 per post. This gap exists because the Creator Fund pays pennies per thousand views, while brand deals scale with the size of the audience. The rank of 1330 out of 1349 positions this creator as a value buy for brands. They do not command a premium and can be negotiated down from the $150 ceiling. A cost per view calculation of $0.0006 suggests that most of the payment goes toward the brand name rather than raw reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds form the core of this feed. Most videos fall into this bucket, and these posts earn much higher engagement than the longer formats. Making your content stay under 15 seconds instead of over 60 seconds offers a performance gap worth more than double the reach. Original audio appears on most posts to build a unique brand identity at the cost of trending sound reach. Captions average 63 characters, meaning the copy remains punchy and brief. Duet and stitch options are available on most videos to encourage others to remix the content. The top video lasted 15 seconds and grabbed 25.3 times the usual reach for this account. It earned 27.2K likes against 1K comments, showing a balanced ratio of passive watching and active talk. Average views near 181.6K mean this account maintains steady volume rather than chasing rare viral spikes.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds with 26 out of 38 clips in this range. The average video length is 18s.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a sparse high-production cadence because their low posting volume is offset by high average views and an established follower rank. While they post well below the field median, the slow pace reflects a deliberate production choice rather than a lack of activity. This pattern has remained stable for over three years. The high consistency variance indicates an erratic schedule with unpredictable gaps between posts. You can expect sporadic drops rather than a dependable drumbeat. New content most frequently lands on Monday and Tuesday around 14:00 UTC. Saturday is the quietest day for new uploads.

Audience & Reach

The audience size sits at a 0.0x multiple of the median creator. This indicates a niche reach that limits the breadth of any single campaign to a small, specific segment rather than broad visibility. The like response falls well below the median rate. Because this gap is substantial, a brand message may struggle to generate engagement from the total number of viewers reached. This account fits the beauty and lifestyle category because the low engagement relative to high play counts suggests an audience that views content for aesthetic inspiration rather than active interaction.