⭒

This account ranks 1331 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is less than one tenth of the median. It is a small account. Growth has been slow over its four year and half month lifespan with only 154 followers gained per month. While the average view count of 215.6K is high for an account of this size, the like rate of 2.79% falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report covers engagement trends and audience consistency.

This audience approves less than the platform average. The low like rate puts the creator in rank 969 of 1349. The data shows high advocacy through word-of-mouth spread compared to other interactions. Shares are the most frequent action at 1.077%. This is followed by saves at 0.293% and comments at 0.035%. The content generated 2.3K shares, 632 saves, and 75 comments per video. While people find the content worth sharing with others, they rarely stop to join a conversation or save it for later reference. A brand can expect high reach through social sharing but should not expect deep community engagement or long-term retention from these viewers. Reach is inconsistent. Only 3 videos reached double the average while 2 hit the five times mark. The coefficient of variation of 3.33 indicates erratic performance across the 37 videos. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator due to their high engagement relative to follower count. A creator with 8.3K followers typically commands between $100 and $250 per post. This figure is more reliable than Creator Fund payouts because those payments scale only with views and pay mere pennies per thousand. Sponsorship fees instead scale with the audience size and brand alignment. The rank of 1331 out of 1349 suggests this creator is a value buy for brands seeking high reach at lower costs. While top ranked names command premiums to decline briefs, a lower ranked profile allows a buyer to treat the $250 ceiling as a starting point for negotiation. A cost per view check shows that a quote near the top of the range results in roughly $0.001 per view. This calculation helps a buyer determine if they are paying for the creator's name or for actual reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Most content stays under 15 seconds to capture attention quickly. This shorter format earns more views than the 30 to 60 second clips, which are less common on this feed. Use a sub-15 second duration as your standard for high engagement. The account uses original audio almost exclusively, choosing a consistent brand voice over the reach of trending sounds. Short captions around 56 characters keep the focus on the visual. Open settings for duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with the content. The standout video lasted 8 seconds and reached 14.8 times the average views. It earned 94.9K likes against 382 comments, showing that rapid consumption won over deep discussion. This high like-to-comment ratio proves the clip worked as a quick tap for viewers. Average views of 215.6K show this account maintains steady reach despite a smaller follower base.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds as 25 out of 37 videos fall into this category. This is the most frequent duration with an average of 14 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a dormant or erratic pattern because they post below the median frequency with an inconsistent gap between uploads. While their average view count is high relative to their follower count, the low frequency rank and irregular posting intervals make it difficult to predict when new content will land. This pace has been established for over seven months but remains unpredictable due to a poor consistency grade. New content typically appears on Thursday and Sunday, while Tuesday is the quietest day for uploads. The busiest upload hour occurs at 02:00 UTC. Marketers should expect sporadic drops rather than a steady drumbeat of posts. You can time tie-ins around the weekend windows, but do not count on a reliable weekly cadence for campaign planning.

Audience & Reach

The account sits below the median follower count with a multiple of zero point zero. This indicates a niche reach where a single campaign will target a specific subculture rather than providing broad coverage. Location data is not available for this account. The like rate falls well below the median mark. A brand message here faces a harder path to engagement because the ratio of interactions to views is lower than average. The audience fits the fashion category because the low engagement relative to high view counts suggests a passive viewing habit common in visual-first style content.