msaleem175#

This account ranks 1201 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds less than one tenth of the median follower count of 1.1 million, making it a small account. It is gaining followers at a fast rate of 13.5K per month despite being only 0.4 years old. While average views reach 175.5K per video, the like rate of 1.86% falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report covers detailed engagement trends and content performance metrics.

This audience approves of content at a lower rate than the platform average, ranking 1162 out of 1349. Engagement patterns show that saves are the primary driver of intent with a 0.077% rate. This is followed by shares at 0.02%, then comments at 0.017%. The raw counts of 135 saves, 35 shares, and 29 comments confirm that users treat this content as a reference tool rather than a conversation starter. The audience over-indexes on saves compared to other interactions. Brands should treat these posts as evergreen resources to be stored by the viewer rather than catalysts for immediate social interaction. Reach is inconsistent and erratic with a coefficient of variation of 4.68. Only two videos hit the 2x average mark while one reached the 5x threshold out of 36 total posts. This suggests that growth is sporadic and not currently driven by steady, predictable trends. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on a following of 69.5K, they can expect an estimated brand deal range of $400 to $800 per post. Creator Fund payouts are unlikely to match these figures because they scale with views and pay only pennies per thousand impressions. Sponsorship fees instead scale with the established follower base to reward the creator for their reach. The rank of 1201 out of 1349 places this account below the median in terms of total following. This position makes them a value buy for brands seeking efficient reach rather than a premium name that can command high premiums. The $800 figure should be viewed as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed rate. A cost-per-view check shows that an $800 deal would pay roughly $4.55 per view. This calculation helps a buyer determine if a quoted price pays for the actual reach of 175.5K views or just the creator's name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The feed thrives in the 15 to 30 second range. Longer clips under 15 seconds see lower engagement compared to this middle bracket. Create content specifically for that mid-length window to capture the most consistent interest. Original audio is used on every post, choosing a unique brand identity over the reach of trending tracks. Captions stay concise at 68 characters to keep the focus on the visual. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to remix the content. The standout video lasted 29 seconds and reached 27.9 times the normal audience. It earned 101.6K likes against 812 comments, showing a heavy tilt toward quick taps over discussion. This suggests viewers enjoyed the visual experience without needing to debate in the replies. Average views of 175.5K confirm this is an established account with steady reach rather than a small niche project.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 15 to 30 seconds. This duration represents the majority of content while the average length is 16s.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind cadence because they post far above the field median with high frequency and consistent output. They produce nearly nineteen videos every week compared to the typical two from other creators. This volume is backed by a high ranking in posting frequency. However, the low consistency grade and high variance indicate that these posts arrive in unpredictable bursts rather than at fixed intervals. This pattern has only been established for 16 days, so the pace is not yet a proven long-term habit. Content typically lands on Friday and Saturday with a peak upload hour of 05:00 UTC. Monday remains the quietest day for new posts. Marketers can expect a high volume of content but should not rely on a predictable daily schedule to time a tie-in. Because the output is heavy, you can plan for frequent placements even if the specific timing of each drop varies.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator, placing it below the typical scale for this platform. This means a single campaign will reach a localized niche rather than providing broad reach. The like rate falls well below the average median, indicating that while content is viewed, it receives less engagement per view. A brand should expect a lower conversion on interactive elements or calls to action. This account fits the beauty and lifestyle category because the low engagement relative to high play counts suggests a passive viewer base typical of visual discovery.