Jojogril12

This account ranks 1144 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.1 times the median, making it a small account. It gains roughly 3.3K followers per month, which indicates slow growth for an account that has been active for 2.7 years. While average views reach 437.2K, the like rate of 0.26% falls well below the 4.93% median. The rest of this report covers engagement patterns and content consistency.

The audience approves of the content far less than typical creators in this category, ranking 1347 out of 1349 for like rates. This low approval rate suggests a passive viewing experience where users do not stop to acknowledge the content. The data reveals that saves are the most frequent action at 0.019% per view compared to shares at 0.004% and comments at 0.001%. With 85 saves, 20 shares, and 5 comments per video, the audience prioritizes personal utility over community interaction or word of mouth. Brands should treat this channel as a repository for reference material rather than a hub for conversation. Reach is erratic with a high consistency coefficient of 3.91. Only three videos hit the 2x average mark while one reached the 5x threshold. This audience is primarily tap-and-scroll.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on a follower count of 105.9K, brand deals likely land between $1,000 and $3,000 per post. Creator Fund payouts are much lower because they pay pennies per thousand views regardless of total audience size. Brand deals scale with the reach of the following while creator funds only reward raw view counts. The rank of 1144 out of 1349 puts this profile in a position to be a value buy for advertisers. Because they sit below the median, their quoted rates should be viewed as a ceiling rather than a fixed salary. A buyer can negotiate down from the upper end of the band to secure better terms. The low like rate suggests that viewers are passive consumers, which may lower the premium paid for the name. A cost per view check helps determine if a quote pays for reach or influence. Dividing the $3,000 top estimate by 437.2K average views results in roughly $0.0069 per view. This low figure indicates that high costs from this creator would be paying for their specific brand presence rather than just raw impressions. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The feed relies on clips between 60 and 180 seconds. Stick to this longer format to mirror how the account currently builds its reach. Every video uses original audio instead of trending sounds, a choice that prioritizes a unique brand identity over borrowed traffic from popular tracks. Captions remain short at around 45 characters to keep the focus on the visual content. Open settings for both duets and stitches invite other creators to interact with and remix every post. The top video lasted 67 seconds and pulled 10.1 million views, which is over 23 times the normal reach seen here. It earned 26,000 likes against only 72 comments, showing a large lean toward passive watching rather than active debate. Average views of 437.2K indicate this is an established account with a steady audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account uses only videos between 60 and 180 seconds long. All 35 recent videos fall into this single category.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the median frequency with a high volume of content. They produce over eleven videos weekly compared to the field average of under two. This high output is supported by a top-tier frequency rank among their peers. While the consistency grade is low, the current pace has been established for nearly three weeks. New content typically lands on Tuesday and Thursday with a peak upload hour at 18:00 UTC. Friday remains the quiet day for new posts. Marketers can expect a rapid drumbeat of content rather than sporadic drops. You can plan a campaign around this frequent output by timing specific tie-ins to land on the active Tuesday or Thursday windows.

Audience & Reach

The account sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator and holds a low follower rank. This size indicates that while individual videos may see high views, the core community is small and lacks broadcast-scale reach for a single campaign. The like response falls far below the median rate. Such a gap means the content reaches many viewers but fails to generate engagement from the majority of those people. This audience fits the entertainment category because the low engagement relative to high play counts suggests a passive viewership model rather than a community-driven one.