leelajournals

This account ranks 1101 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds 130.6K followers, which is less than 0.1 times the median follower count of 1.1M. It is a small account. Growth is slow for an account that has been active for 5.1 years given the gain of 2.1K followers per month. The average view count of 115.4K per video is high for this follower size. This reach outperforms expectations because the 7.36% like rate exceeds the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report covers deeper engagement metrics and content performance trends.

This audience approves content at a rate well above the platform median. The high engagement rank of 463 out of 1349 confirms strong viewer sentiment. Saves represent the most frequent action among viewers, followed by shares and comments. These actions translate to 1,000 saves, 247 shares, and 66 comments per video. High save rates compared to low comment counts indicate a community that treats content as a reference tool rather than a conversation hub. Brands can expect high retention of the message but should not expect active dialogue in the comments. The reach shows some volatility with a consistency score of 2.95. While only 3 videos reached double the average and 2 reached five times the average, the numbers suggest an inconsistent growth pattern. This audience is an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary income stream for this creator. A follower count of 130.6K suggests a target brand fee between $2,500 and $4,000 per post. This revenue stems from direct partnerships rather than the Creator Fund. The fund pays only pennies per thousand views, whereas sponsorship fees scale with the size of the audience. The rank of 1101 out of 1349 places this creator in a position where they are viewed as a value buy. They do not command the premium pricing of top-ranked accounts that can decline briefs based on fame alone. The $2,500 to $4,000 range serves as a ceiling for negotiations rather than a fixed salary. High engagement rates suggest they sit toward the higher end of this specific bracket. A cost per view check helps determine if a quote pays for reach or for the name. Dividing the top end of the sponsorship band by 115.4K average views results in roughly $0.03 per view. This figure allows buyers to test if a high quote is justified by actual impressions. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The sweet spot for this account is the 30 to 60 second window where most clips reside. Content under 15 seconds performs poorly compared to these mid-length videos, which garner a much higher engagement rate per view. This suggests you should favor steady pacing over rapid cuts. Original audio appears on nearly half of the posts, showing a willingness to trade some potential reach for a distinct brand identity. Long captions averaging over 500 characters provide deep context for each post. Open duet and stitch settings across most videos invite other creators to interact with the content. The standout clip lasted 49 seconds and earned roughly 16.5 times the normal reach of this account. It pulled in a high ratio of likes to comments, meaning it won through passive watching rather than sparking active debate. Average views stay around 115k, marking this as a consistent community-focused account. You should aim for steady growth within this established audience.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 30 and 60 seconds with 15 occurrences. This category contains more videos than any other duration listed.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

Sparse high-production is the cadence for this creator because her low posting frequency pairs with a top-tier average view count and a large follower base. She produces content far below the median rate, but her reach remains high despite the gaps between posts. This pace has been established over nearly two years of activity. Because the consistency grade is low and the variation in gap lengths is high, she does not follow a predictable posting schedule. New content most often lands on Tuesday or Friday around 22:00 UTC. Wednesday serves as her quietest day for new uploads. Marketers should expect sporadic drops rather than a dependable drumbeat of posts when planning a campaign.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.1x multiple of the median creator, which identifies this as a niche community rather than a broadcast-scale account. A brand can expect high relevance within a specific subculture instead of wide reach across a general audience. Engagement levels exceed the median like rate by more than two percentage points. This indicates that the content generates a stronger engagement signal per viewer than average, making for a highly effective placement for a targeted message. The profile fits the beauty and lifestyle category because the high like response suggests an audience that engages deeply with aesthetic content despite the smaller follower count.