Jesper & Bea💍

This account ranks 1311 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.0x the median size of 1.1M, making it a small account. It is growing at a fast rate of 15.3K followers per month despite only being active for 0.1 years. The average view count of 3.8M sits well above what its follower size would predict. However, the 4.20% like rate falls below the median of 4.93%. The rest of this report details specific engagement trends and content performance.

The audience approves of the content less than the platform average. This lower engagement rate places the creator in rank 758 of 1349. Shares represent the most frequent behavior with a 0.955% rate, followed by saves at 0.52%. Comments occur at a much lower frequency of 0.03%. These figures mean that while 1.1K comments show some conversation, the 36.0K shares and 19.6K saves prove high advocacy and keeper value. This audience prioritizes passing content along to others over active discussion in the comment section. Brands should focus on shareable utility rather than community management. Reach is erratic for this creator. Only 2 videos out of 11 reached double the average, while only one hit the 5x mark. A high consistency coefficient of 1.95 indicates that the reach fluctuates well from video to video. This is a share-focused audience rather than an active discussion community.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships drive the primary revenue stream for this creator rather than Creator Fund payouts. While the Creator Fund pays pennies per thousand views, sponsorship deals scale with follower counts to provide a more stable income. A brand deal for this account likely falls between $150 and $300. The low ranking of 1311 out of 1349 makes this profile a value buy for advertisers. High-ranking names command premium prices and can decline briefs, but a lower rank suggests the quoted range is a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed salary. The 4.20 percent like rate sits slightly below the median, which may allow for more aggressive negotiation on the higher end of the bracket. A cost per view analysis helps determine if a quote pays for reach or just the creator name. With 3.8M average views, a $150 fee results in a cost per view of roughly $0.04. This low figure indicates that high engagement and reach provide the primary value here. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Short clips under 15 seconds define this feed perfectly. Every video falls into this bucket, and since there are no longer videos to compare it to, this should be your standard length. Original audio is used on every post, a choice that prioritizes a unique brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Captions stay brief at around 44 characters to keep the focus on the visuals. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to interact with the content. The standout video lasted 6 seconds and reached 24.7 million views, which is about 6.6 times the normal reach of this account. It earned 1.2 million likes against 3.9k comments, showing that viewers preferred quick taps over active debate. This high ratio of likes to comments suggests a passive viewing experience for the audience. Average views of 3.8 million mean this account already commands a very large and established reach.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos under 15 seconds with an average of 7s. All 11 recent videos fall into this category.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post well above the field median with a high volume of content relative to their peers. While the frequency rank is in the top half of the field, the consistency grade is low and the variance between posts is high. This erratic rhythm has only been established for 27 days, so it is too early to confirm if this pace will remain stable over time. New content typically lands on Friday and Sunday, while Wednesday remains a quiet day for uploads. The busiest hour for new posts occurs at 01:00 UTC. Marketers should expect sporadic drops rather than a predictable schedule, but they can target the weekend windows to align with the most frequent upload days.

Audience & Reach

The follower count ranks near the bottom of the tracked field at a zero point zero multiple of the median creator. This signifies an audience that lacks broadcast reach despite high view counts on individual pieces of content. A like response below the median suggests the engagement is less intense than average for this platform. A brand message will likely receive a softer reception from viewers compared to more engaged creators. This profile fits the lifestyle category because the niche focus aligns with an audience that receives lower interaction rates despite high view volumes.