Boba_Asmr

This account ranks 687 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.9 times the median size of 1.1M. It is a mid-tier name that remains just under the typical follower threshold for the platform. The growth rate of 203.5K followers per month over its 0.4 years of existence qualifies as fast growth for an account this young. While average views reach 778.5K, the like rate of 0.88% falls well below the median of 4.93%. This discrepancy suggests that while the content reaches many people, it fails to generate high levels of active engagement compared to other creators at its scale. The rest of this report breaks down the specific content pillars driving these views and identifies patterns in audience retention.

This audience approves less than average as the like rate of 0.88% falls well below the 4.93% median. This puts the creator in rank 1313 of 1349 for initial engagement. The behavior data shows a clear preference for retention over interaction. Saves are the most frequent action at 0.089%, followed by shares at 0.044%, and comments at 0.011%. These figures translate to 697 saves, 346 shares, and 87 comments per video. The audience values the content as a reference point or for private storage rather than public conversation. Brands should treat this channel as a destination for utility or aesthetic inspiration instead of a hub for community building. Reach is inconsistent across the 34 videos. Only 17.6% of posts reached double the average, with only one video hitting the five times multiplier. A consistency score of 2.37 indicates erratic growth patterns. This is a tap-and-scroll audience.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorships provide the primary revenue stream for this creator. Based on a follower count of 982.7K, they likely command a sponsorship band between $5,000 and $10,000 per post. Creator Fund payouts are much lower because those payments scale with views and pay only pennies per thousand. Brands pay for the reach and influence tied to a large following rather than just raw view counts. The rank of 687 out of 1349 places this creator in a middle position where they lack the leverage of top-tier names but still hold steady authority. Because they are not in the top tier, their quoted rate should be viewed as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed salary. A cost per view calculation suggests a price point around $0.01 to $0.13 for an average video reaching 778.5K people. This helps a buyer determine if a quote is paying for the specific name or just the reach. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

This account thrives in the 15 to 30 second window where every recent video lands. Create content in this specific bracket to mirror the established flow of the feed. Original audio appears on every post, a choice that favors a consistent brand identity over the reach of trending sounds. Long captions average 164 characters to provide deep context for each clip. Duet and stitch settings remain open across the board, inviting other creators to remix the content. The top video lasted 19 seconds and reached 12.7 times the normal audience. It earned a high ratio of 108 likes per comment, which points toward passive watching rather than active debate. High engagement on this clip came from quick taps instead of long discussions. Average views near 778k show an established presence where consistency is key to maintaining the current scale.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

Every video on this account is between 15 and 30 seconds long. The average length for these videos is 22 seconds.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

The creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at a volume far above the field median with frequent updates. This high output is supported by an average gap of only eleven hours between posts. While their posting frequency ranks in the top tenth of the field, the recent two-week span means this pace is not yet a proven long-term habit. The consistency grade is low due to large fluctuations in the timing of these uploads. You can expect a high volume of content but should plan for an erratic schedule rather than a clockwork one. New posts typically land on Thursday and Friday, while Tuesday remains the quiet day. Most content drops around 11:00 UTC. Marketers can rely on a steady stream of new material to support a campaign, though specific daily timing will vary.

Audience & Reach

The audience size ranks in the middle of the tracked creator pool at a 0.9x multiple of the median. This indicates a smaller reach for any single campaign compared to top-of-field creators. Location data is not available for this account. The like response falls well below the median rate. Such a low engagement ratio suggests that while the views are high, the content does not generate strong interaction from the viewers. This means a sponsored post may struggle to gain traction or surface in social feeds due to low engagement signals. The audience fits the beverage category because of the specific niche and the high view counts despite the lower like response.