Rockymimss

This account ranks 1229 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is less than one tenth of the median size for this group. It is a small account. Growth is steady as it adds 2.7K followers every month over its 1.6 year lifespan. The average view count of 856.6K per video stands well above what is expected for an account with 50.7K followers. However, the 4.62% like rate falls below the 4.93% median, suggesting that while the content reaches a wide audience, it generates less active engagement than typical creators in this bracket. The rest of the report covers detailed engagement trends and historical performance data.

The audience approves less than the typical viewer for this creator. This community shows much higher intent to return through saves and shares compared to their low level of direct conversation. The 0.518% save rate outpaces the 0.507% share rate while the 0.011% comment rate remains very low. With 95 comments, 4.3K shares, and 4.4K saves per video, the data indicates a community that consumes content for personal reference rather than public discussion. Brands should treat this as a high-retention channel where users archive content they find useful. Reach is inconsistent due to a 2.34 consistency coefficient. Only 14.3% of 35 videos reached double the average, with only 3 reaching five times the average. This audience is an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator because of their high engagement relative to follower count. While Creator Fund payouts scale with views and pay mere pennies per thousand, sponsorship rates scale with total followers and can reach a band of $500 to $1,500 per post. Their 4.62 percent like rate keeps them toward the lower end of that potential range since it sits slightly below the median. The ranking of 1229 out of 1349 means this creator is priced as a value buy rather than a premium name. A top ranked account commands a high fee to decline work, but a lower ranked profile offers a bargain where the quoted band acts as a ceiling for negotiations. A cost per view analysis shows that at 856.6K average views, a $1,000 quote results in a price of $0.0011 per view. This metric helps a buyer determine if they are paying for actual reach or just the creator's name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The feed thrives on videos between 60 and 180 seconds. You should target this longer duration because it captures a much larger share of the content than the sub-30 second clips. The average length sits at 56 seconds, making these mid-length pieces the standard for consistent reach. Original audio dominates nearly all posts, trading potential trend spikes for a distinct brand identity. Short captions around 37 characters ensure the text stays punchy and easy to read. Open duet and stitch settings invite other creators to engage with every post. The standout clip lasted 20 seconds and earned over ten times the normal reach of this account. It gathered 406.1K likes against only 899 comments, meaning it won through passive watching rather than active debate. Average views near 856K show this is a stable, established presence with consistent volume. Focus on maintaining these high engagement floors through long-form storytelling and broad appeal.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 60 and 180 seconds since they make up more than half of the recent content. No engagement line is available to determine which length performs best.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

The creator follows a Grind pattern because they post above the field median with frequent content gaps. They currently post over two videos per week while the average creator posts less than twice weekly. This pace has been established for over 100 days, making it a durable habit. However, the high consistency variance indicates an erratic rhythm rather than a clockwork schedule. You can expect regular content, but the specific timing of drops fluctuates between bursts and quiet stretches. New videos land most often on Sunday and Tuesday around 22:00 UTC. Content rarely appears on Saturday. Marketers can plan for a steady drumbeat of posts to support a campaign even if the exact timing varies week to week.

Audience & Reach

The follower count sits at a 0.0x multiple of the median creator, placing it below the typical scale for this platform. This means a campaign here targets a niche pocket rather than achieving broad reach across the wider ecosystem. While the like response is lower than the median by nearly one percent, the engagement remains consistent with standard expectations. A brand message will land with steady impact but lacks the heightened enthusiasm seen in top-performing accounts. This audience fits the lifestyle category because the modest follower count and stable engagement suggest a specific niche rather than mass appeal.