ليمونه ✨🇦🇪

This account ranks 1001 out of 1349 tracked creators and holds a follower count that is 0.2 times the median size of 1.1 million, making this a small account. It has gained 4.4K followers every month over its 4.0 year lifespan, which indicates slow growth for an account of this age. The average view count of 238.4K per video is well above what the follower size would predict. However, the like rate of 1.39% falls below the median of 4.93%, suggesting a gap between reach and active engagement. The rest of the report covers deeper engagement metrics and content consistency.

This audience approves less than the average viewer because the like rate of 1.39% falls well below the 4.93% median. They rank 1261 out of 1349 for approval. Shares are the most common action at 0.397%, followed by saves at 0.125%, and comments at 0.072%. These figures represent 947 shares, 297 saves, and 172 comments across the content. High share rates indicate strong word-of-mouth spread despite low passive approval. Brands should treat this as a community that advocates for content they find useful enough to pass on. Reach is inconsistent with a consistency coefficient of 2.18. Only 4 videos hit the 2x average mark while 2 reached the 5x threshold. This indicates erratic growth patterns rather than steady climb. The audience is an active one.

Engagement Quality Analysis

These use the median rather than the average, so one freak viral video cannot inflate them. They show the level a typical post on this account actually reaches.

Sponsorship deals provide the primary revenue stream for this creator because of their follower base. They should command a fee between $1,000 and $3,000 per post. This high gap exists because Creator Fund payouts are based on views and pay only pennies per thousand. Sponsorship fees instead scale with the total audience size to provide meaningful income for creators at this level. Their rank of 1001 out of 1349 places them below the median in terms of follower count. This position makes them a value buy for brands rather than a premium name that can demand high premiums. The quoted range serves as a ceiling to bargain under instead of a fixed salary. A cost per view check shows they earn roughly $0.004 to $0.012 per view based on the 238,400 average views. This calculation helps buyers determine if a quote pays for actual reach or just the brand name. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

The content thrives in the 30 to 60 second window where nearly half of the posts land. Focus on this duration to mirror the most common format on the page. Because the 15 to 30 second bucket performs well worse than the longer clips, sticking to the 30 to 60 second range captures more engagement per view. Most videos use original audio instead of trends to build a distinct brand voice over borrowed reach. Short captions at 28 characters keep the focus on the visuals while duet and stitch options are always open to encourage others to remix the content. The best video ran for 33 seconds and pulled 11.7 times the average views. It earned roughly 10 likes for every comment, a ratio that signals high engagement through active discussion rather than just passive scrolling. These numbers point toward a community that talks back. Average views near 238k confirm this is an established account with steady reach rather than a small niche project.

Video Duration Breakdown

How the account's recent videos split across length bands. It shows the format the creator leans on, from very short clips to long-form.

The account favors videos between 30 to 60 seconds as they are the most frequent length. No engagement line is provided for this data.

Original Sound Usage

Percentage of videos using the creator's own audio

This creator follows a Grind pattern because they post at a volume far exceeding the field median with very short gaps between uploads. The high frequency rank places them among the most active creators on the platform. However, the inconsistent gap variance and low consistency grade suggest this pace is currently erratic rather than clockwork. This specific posting behavior has only been observed for 8 days, so the rhythm is not yet a proven long-term habit. New content typically lands on Thursday and Friday, with Monday being the quietest day of the week. The busiest hour for new uploads occurs at 00:00 UTC. Marketers can expect a high volume of content but should prepare for sporadic drops rather than a predictable schedule. Campaigns are most likely to find fresh posts during the late week windows.

Audience & Reach

The follower rank of 1001 puts this account below the median creator size. Because the count sits at a 0.2x multiple of the typical tracked creator, a brand should expect limited reach for any single campaign execution. The like response falls well below the median rate of 4.93%. This lower engagement percentage suggests that while views occur, the content does not generate a strong reaction from those viewers. This account fits the lifestyle category because the small follower base and low like response indicate a niche reach rather than broad appeal.